this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
154 points (98.1% liked)

politics

24638 readers
2463 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 hours ago

So... I dont really follow city politics closely at all, but I don't think I've ever seen anything like I've been seeing with NYC before.

People are scared.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago

What they actually want is to defeat the people supporting mamdani.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 13 hours ago

Free bus rides are SOO SCWARY

[–] [email protected] 22 points 13 hours ago

"As a politician elected by the people we must stop this anti-capitalist from helping the people." And the dissonant march to oblivion continues.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

"Vote blue, no matter who!"
"Wait, no! Not like that!"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 20 hours ago

The only thing they can actually action is cruelty

[–] [email protected] 33 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I hope he wins handily. Maybe at least one small part of the party could realize that the people are sick of the same old policies and even more tired of seeing the same names on the ballot. Someone would primary the governor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If he wins and things go well in NYC, that's probably pretty scary for them as that means a congress or presidency run in the future.

Cut his legs off now before he gets to do the later things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

As someone else pointed out, this infighting is a bad look and will likely cause more problems for the party. They could just do what is expected and support the candidate who was chosen by the people, as many voters have done in the past. He will be lucky to accomplish half of what he has laid out in 4 years. He will not be impossible to primary at that point.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Cant have an honest politician making them look bad lol

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's all so rigged. We have such little power against big money. The Dems work for the billionaires too. As soon as someone steps in who threatens the wealthy and would actually tax them, this shit happens. It was obvious with Bernie in 2016. It's obvious now.

It's a big club and we ain't in it.

Dems are not our friends although they are objectively better than Republicans obviously.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago

Arm up friends. It's well past time to refresh the roots of the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So much god-damned attention on a fucking mayoral race. Sure, it's NYC, but he's still just the mayor. Like they could have just ignored him and sapped the energy from his win, and then primaried him when his term was up.

It's just further evidence that the Democratic leadership is entirely inept.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

It's what he plans to do that they simply cannot allow to exist in any form. If things like state run grocery stores are successful people are going to start to wonder if other democratic socialist policies could work as well.

We can't have that here in America, we need a tiny group of capitalists to own everything and charge you extra so they can enjoy being parasites.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

The stupid thing is (for them) is they're bringing it so much attention. If he win, and if the policies are successful, now surely people will know it. The smart thing would probably be to just let it go, let him win and do his thing, and keep it as quite as possible. I'd never accuse them of being smart though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I understand why he's a threat to them, I just don't understand their battle strategy. Everything they do to attack him elevates his profile and makes actual Democrats suspicious of the oligarchs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Rich people:

we can’t freeze rents!

Renters:

why the fuck not?

Mamdani:

well, we can, actually.

Renters:

voting noises

Rich people:

sad capitalism noises

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

It’s only the financial center of the world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Sure, but again, he's the mayor. He can't set financial policy for the banks of the world. NYC has a huge administrative budget, but it ends at the five boroughs. He can't be like "All UN delegates have to end all wars." He has authority over city administrative issues, and it looks like Trump is going to go after him personally.

Important things happen in his city, and that makes him the most powerful mayor in the country. But that's like being the tallest elementary school student. And the job is a career killer. The last NYC mayor to be elected to higher office was in 1869.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Not for long with how Trump is fucking up trade with the rest of world and dollars and bonds aren't looking to hot.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago

"Vote blue no matter who" was blatant hypocrisy, how fucking surprising.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't see that one coming.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Neither did he

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 day ago

"I'm really not here to represent any candidate," Paterson said.

"I'm just here to villify the one who actually won the fucking primary because fuck democracy, y'all. We own your asses, we call the shots, and like hell are we gonna let you people change that!"

[–] [email protected] 140 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Imagine wanting to lose so badly, that you're out there, actively sabotaging one of the most popular candidates in recent history.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago

2016 is calling, crying into the phone in co-misery.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 12 hours ago

They would 100% rather lose than "win" with an anticapitalist candidate. They aren't there to win elections, they are there to gatekeep against the left.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't see any of that energy for stopping Trump from the democrats. They'd rather have fascism over free buses.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Because the fascist does not endanger their cushy seats. If Trump wins, they will win next election after people are sick of Trump.

If they let people like Mamdani replace them in their own party, they are never getting elected again.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 day ago

Democrats openly attacking Mamdani.