this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
537 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2600 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When Trump was president, Republicans fought to repeal the health insurance program.

Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance claimed Tuesday night — in contradiction of history — that his running mate, former President Donald Trump, “salvaged Obamacare,” the health insurance program that Trump tried to kill.

During the vice presidential debate on CBS against Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Vance, a senator from Ohio, echoed Trump’s own recent revisionism. But the assertion also served to remind voters that Democrats ultimately won the yearslong political fight over expanding access to health insurance: The Republican ticket no longer wants to repeal the 2010 law.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That plan has been 2 weeks away for a fucking decade.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Doesn’t everyone on both sides already know this? Is journalism just stating the obvious now? Is this how we are going to be fed from now on?

Man. That’s sad.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

No. People who watch Fox News exclusively don’t know this. It’s the problem with that channel in particular.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When one side of the political spectrum continually lies about literally everything, stating the obvious has basically become the job of journalists.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The problem isn't that they lie about everything well not the big problem. The real problem is the cultists believe the lies. We have the truths on video and they will choose to be duped.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People are down voting this, but you're right. Politicians that lie is a problem, but not a new one, and not one that we don't know how to handle. People believing the lies of the politicians is what mostly gets us into our hot water. Critical thinking is at a critical shortage these days.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Honestly my problem isn't with the MAGA hat wearing dingdongs out there who drink the kool-aid without question daily. It's the "undecideds" that piss me off. The people who can't be faffed to pay enough attention to what is going on beyond their home to realize who it is that actually has their best interests in mind. The women who voted for Trump and then after his SCOTUS picks gutted a woman's right to abortion were all shocked Pikachu about how that happened and how the state they live in is now completely blocking their access to life giving medications and procedures in the name of saving fetuses that they won't give two shits about once born.

Or the fucking morons who were utterly flabbergasted that the removal of the benefits of the ACA and the government assistance offered by it suddenly cancelled their ability to have health insurance. And then they turn around and buy Trump's utter lies that it was somehow Biden's fault and not the entire Republican party who worked tirelessly to get those things shitcanned.

Those are the ones that truly piss me off. And they can all go fuck themselves. Conservatives are just selfish people who don't care about anyone but themselves and their immediate loved ones(if even that). And I wish nothing but pain and misery on all of them.

And undecideds are dipshit morons who can't pull their heads out of their asses long enough to see the mess the world and the country is in and realize who's actually responsible for all of it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man… that really bums me out. I wish we didn’t have to be here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you don't like it, vote.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have. Every election. Yet we’re still here. Got any other suggestions?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Guillotines. Lots and lots of guillotines.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Trump and the GOP are directly responsible for killing the part of ACA that required people to have insurance in 2017. That is what allowed all the young healthy people to drop their insurance which caused costs to go up for everyone else. It de-socialized it.

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Cuts_and_Jobs_Act

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's sort of true, sort of not. The insurance companies were foaming at the mouth for this. It means they are unchecked in their march towards profit.

This was going to raise the price of medical care regardless of whether healthy people were in it or not. We have an aging, fat, sick society and they require very expensive care.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We have an aging, fat, sick society and they require very expensive care.

This is the exact reason why the mandate existed. Having all the young and healthy people paying into the insurance as well offsets the costs. That being said it would have been far better to have a public insurance run by the government that wasn't beholden to profit. AKA M4A

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm 100% for universal health, single payer, or whatever gets health insurance companies out of the game.

But even if healthy people were forced into the system the ACA still makes private insurance unaffordable for regular people. If you don't have an employee who's sponsoring it, you're fucked.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

We can send billions to Israel to start WW3 with. But we can’t give health care to our own population.

God I hate this country. Especially the leadership

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Obama was right. Once people lived with the ACA, they wouldn’t want to go back. The GOP knows that now, so now they’re going to pretend that they fixed it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

All Donnie had to do was get his Congress to vote in some meaningless changes, and then proclaim that he'd 'fixed Obamacare' and take a victory lap. Put TrumpCare on the site and tell his MAGoos to sign up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Just Doubledown Vance

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"in contradiction of history" is just a fancy way of saying that he lied. Call him a fucking liar like he is.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Journalistically, I think "lying" implies willfullness, and a reporter cannot 100% prove that a false statement was made willfully, with knowledge that the statement was false.

What the reporter can do is point out that the statement was false, with evidence that demonstrates that, even including statements to the contrary by the person making the false statement before and after. But you can't know for sure in the moment a false statement is being made that the person believed it was false as they were making it.

This journalistic concept is part of the reason the couch fucker meme took off. AP (was it AP?) published a story about how "No, JD Vance did not have sex with a couch," and then retracted it. Why? Because while there's no evidence that JD Vance did have sex with a couch, and there's plenty of evidence that JD Vance having sex with a couch was just a joke, there isn't any proof that JD Vance didn't have sex with a couch.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And yet Fox News will run a dozen stories on how Walz "lied" about his time in China.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Lol, you think Fox "News" is actually news? They've successfully argued in court that they're an entertainment company, so anyone who thinks their name means they have anything more than a tenuous connection to the truth is either dumb as fuck or just not paying any attention.

So the core Faux Lies viewer base.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That was bizarre and I have no idea what it was truly about. Seemed personal. On the other hand, just the other week Vance told some lies and brought terrorism to a community because of it. Which one is more important?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Walz was in China around the time of the Tiananmen Square protests but not at the time of the actual massacre.

load more comments
view more: next ›