this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
67 points (97.2% liked)

Asklemmy

48517 readers
783 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When examined, or just because it's weird on its own.

Example: Beat a dead horse

  1. You whip a horse to go faster
  2. It dies from being whipped too much
  3. You still want the horse to go faster
  4. You continue to whip it
(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Hoisted by my own petard (to be foiled by your own plan), is a nice flowery one, although it actually makes sense. The bee's knees (for something excellent) is a good one that makes no sense. Wet behind the ears (inexperienced) is another cool one.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My father-in-law from rural west Texas refers to things as being 'slicker than owl shit' and some people as being 'richer than ten feet up a bull's ass.'

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are a lot of good Texasism. I was living in Texas when I first heard "Oh bless her heart.". Mean either she's a good person, or she's dumber than dog shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

"It's raining cats and dogs."

Somehow, heavy rain is represented by a downpour of household animals.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"By and large" is a weird one. It's meaning is along the same lines as "all other things being equal." Is it a reference to large sample sizes?

It's made weirder by the fictional corporation name in Wall-E, "Buy 'n Large"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

My wife has worked with lots of people who are not native English speakers who are sometimes taken aback by the idioms. One colleague flat out refused to accept that "FOMO" is a word.

I suggested that she is in a position to make some up, like "Let's not put fish in the milk bucket." But she didn't go for it. I guess she's not an agent of chaos after all :/

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Mind your ps and qs. What are ps and qs?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I know there are lots of possible origins for this phrase, but I think of it as "pleases" and "thank yous". The "k" sound from "thank" followed by the word "you" combine to sound like the letter q.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I've heard that it means pints and quarts, referring to beers. I feel like I've also heard it was a typesetter thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

"it'll be a bloodbath in there!" *used for anything political wise.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"There's more than one way to skin a cat."

  1. You have a cat.
  2. You wish to remove its skin.
  3. You realize there's more than just one method to accomplish this unusual task.
  4. You state this proudly as a metaphor for problem-solving flexibility.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does the pope shit in the woods?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A humerous combo of 'Do bears shit in the woods?' and 'Is the Pope Catholic?' Which are two jokey ways of saying 'Yeah, obviously, duh'.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But does the pope shit in the woods?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

No, but bears are catholic

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

No, he's trapped in the pope mobile , that thing isn't equipped for offroad travel

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You can lead a whore to water, but you can't make her douche.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Yap, still guessing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Dollars to donuts.

WTF does it even mean?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

I'm so sure that this thing will happen, that I'm willing to make a bet whereby I'll pay you dollars if it doesn't happen, and you pay me donuts if it does. I feel like I'm getting free donuts and my dollars are not at risk.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Well, back in the day, a doughnut cost a lot less than a donut.

So, betting dollars against donuts would be a bad idea.

Not that it was ever a betting term, it just condone contains a reference to betting.

It's like saying "hey, lets get dinner. You give me a twig for every dollar I put in."

You're either exchanging something of unequal value, or making an "investment" where you get very little return on it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Taking God's name in vain

  1. You invoke God on some topic you're wrong about.
  2. God appears and sees your worthless comment.
  3. ????
  4. God punishes you, or he backs away, or he learns to not listen to you anymore in boy cries wolf type situation? Its really not clear what the repercussions are.
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No, no, it was originally "Taking God's name in vein," as saying the name of God out loud would allow Him into your blood. If you say the name of God, you allow him to inhabit your blood, gain your power, and become even more mighty. The ancient Hebrews feared God gaining too much power, as He would be able to destroy the world. Then Christians figured out that if they took Communion and instead drank the blood of Christ, they could reverse the Hebrew God's power and slowly increase their own until they could ascend to the heavens and do battle with the Almighty, empowered by His blood in their veins, rather than weakened by taking His name in vein. In this seventeen-part essay, I will describe how we can defeat God by

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is mind blowing if true. Is this real? What's going on here? Are you serious?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This lore makes more sense than the bible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

The bible is a collection of thousands of years of oral history and societal laws put to paper generations after the fact, allegory and letters to random fuckers and varying accounts of a Jewish cult leader who was executed for crimes against the state. It's gonna have a potted narrative.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

That's one that always bothered me too. When I say "Jesus fucking Christ" I mean it. Which is it's own weird ism when you think about it...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"scientists say..."

They aren't some unified entity. They don't even agree amongst themselves on most things if one digs deep enough. While there is some interpretation of the data involved, most people that use the phrase "Scientists say..." are essentially saying "Objective observations done by several of the smartest humans have been argued over by several of their rivals resulting in..."

Like, we should start calling them something like Observational Data Warriors β„’ /s to put perspective on the magnitude of information and depth involved. You can have an opinion but you are a coward of no relevant value if you are not trained for battle and fighting on the front lines. So whatever nonsense you have to say results in you looking like a clown of no note.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Scientists say "im off to work dear, see you this afternoon”.

but seriously, we have to trust experts in STEM just to get through our day. Every time someone give the "scientists can be wrong too” line i look up at the ceiling as if its about to collapse. Sure science is about continuous improvement and falsifiability but that guys PHD is not equivalent to your youtube recomendations pipeline.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"I'm not here to fuck spiders" - said by Australians who want to drop the preamble and get down to business.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And here I was, just assuming that to be true about most people...
How inconsiderate of me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Well, it's Australia. Spiders have the vote.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's hilarious, I should try that out

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Nah, surprise everyone.

Leap into the room, exclaim "I'm here to fuck spiders", then drop trou and hump a cobweb.

Keep the bastards guessing

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί