this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
446 points (90.5% liked)

Technology

70248 readers
4209 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 45 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Let's work 20 hour weeks then. Who wants AGI other than war pigs and billionaires?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 184 points 2 months ago (24 children)

AGI is not in reach. We need to stop this incessant parroting from tech companies. LLMs are stochastic parrots. They guess the next word. There's no thought or reasoning. They don't understand inputs. They mimic human speech. They're not presenting anything meaningful.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

Lmfao

Yeah, Cloud Console would probably suck less too

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

So he's saying it's not in reach then.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No, but lets go get some margaritas.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 9 points 2 months ago

Slushy the rich?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 129 points 2 months ago (3 children)

"Work 50% longer weeks so you can make something that'll both make me richer AND cost you your jobs!" is not the motivational speech he thinks it is.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't even know what AGI is, and I read the headline as "rich disconnected from reality asshole".

Turns out I was right.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

A liar, scam artist, and scumbag.

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 67 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it can be reached in 60 hour work weeks it can be reached in 40, but nah mfs should rush to get themselves replaced

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it can be reached in 60 hour work weeks, then it can be reached in 40 hour work weeks be hiring a second person.

If management isn't willing to put the effort in of hiring the required staff, why would I want to work the job of 2 people for 1 persons pay?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 9 points 2 months ago

IT project management doesn't work that way, but it doesn't matter much. 60 hour work weeks wouldn't help, either.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Or, y'know, he could hire 50% more programmers / contractors, instead of overworking his current staff

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

There's an upper limit to how many bodies you can throw at a task.

9 women won't make a baby in one month.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

That wouldn't allow him to also simultaneously pay low wages.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

What if you do more with less?

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Then you wouldn't need to tell people to work more hours.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

He isn't even using that head anyways, seems like some cost cutting is in order.

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

...and the horse he road in on.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Is Google in the cloning business? Because I could swear that's Zack Freedman from the Youtube 3D printing channel. He even wears the heads-up display (Youtube Link). Sorry for being off-Topic but who cares about what tech CEOs say about AGI anyway?

[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 months ago

What a brilliant suggestion, no way an AI could have come up with that, executive jobs are safe forever!

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What is the point, though?

If you made AGI, you'd have a computer that thinks like a person. Okay? We already have minds that think like a person: they're called people!

I get that there is some belief that if you can make a digital consciousness, you can make a digital super-conciousness, but genuinely stop and ask what the utility is, and it's equal parts useless and evil.

First, this premise is totally unexamined. Maybe it can think faster or hold more information in mind at one moment, but what basis is there for such a creation actually exceeding the ingenuity of a group of humans working together? What problem is this going to solve? A "cure for cancer"? The bottleneck to cutting cancer isn't ideas, it's that cell research takes actual time and money. You need it synthesize molecules and watch cells grow, and pay for lab infrastructure. "Intelligence" isn't the limiting element!

The primary purpose is just to crater the value of human labor, by replacing human workers with workers with godlike powers of reasoning. Good luck with that. I'm sure they won't come to the exact reasoning as any exploited worker in 120 nano-seconds.

It's like Jason's problem-solving advice in "The Good Place":

“Any time I had a problem, and I threw a Molotov cocktail… Boom, right away, I had a different problem.”

Sure. Let's work ourselves to death forTHIS.

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think a device will ever have a thought. I find it somewhat akin to a belief in the anamism of objects, that it will aquire some form of life force of its own. What a thought is, is a complete mystery. Nobody knows why they happen, where they come from. So, who is even to determine whether an inamimate object is exhibiting signs of consciousness? There are some people that believe it, others are just running a con.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

No. Dumbass.

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They talk about AGI like it's some kind of intrinsically benevolent messiah that is going to come along and free humanity of limitations rather than a product that is going to be monetised to make a few very rich people even richer

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And somehow it will run on thin air

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

What if the whole earth, itself, is like, one giant supercomputer, designed to answer the ultimate question, and it's just been running for billions of years?

[–] SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a belief in Techno-Jesus that will solve all our problems so we don't have to solve them ourselves (don't need to do the uncomfortable things we don't want to). Just like aliens, the singularity, etc.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Ironically the world is full of people who like to think about solutions to problems. But those in power won’t put them to solve those because it’s not part of the political game.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I'm pretty sure the science says it's more like 20-30. I know personally, if I try to work more than about 40-ish hours in a week, the time comes out of the following week without me even trying. A task that took two hours in a 45-hour "crunch" week will end up taking three when I don't have to crunch. And if I keep up the crunch for too long, I start making a lot of mistakes.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

I hope they tell him to get fucked.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you all work harder we’ll be able to fire you and increase my bonus!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Disgusting prasite seeking free labour

[–] ech@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Perhaps this is what you mean, but it's even worse than just unpaid hours for current employees. His implicit goal is to generate a slave-class of people (which is what actual AI would be) that he can make more of or delete at his whim, and eliminate to livelihoods of any current employees (besides him and other execs, of course).

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You know it's bad when I had to click all the way through to the body of the article to verify this isn't a The Onion thing. Do we still have a "Not The Onion" space here?

[–] LettucePrey@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

lmao, what a tool

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 299 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That's why I bake my cake at 2608°C for ~1,8 minutes, it just works™

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Burnt crust full of liquid cake. yum!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 2 months ago

maybe ai should work that extra time.

load more comments