this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
733 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

16230 readers
1434 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 56 points 6 months ago

Clearly sounds like undiagnosed mental illness. I hope that lady gets some help.

[–] [email protected] 228 points 6 months ago (6 children)

i wonder why nobody signed the farewell card for the type of ass to sue for not getting a farewell card.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago (5 children)

What's the opposite of eating the onion? I read your comment and scoffed, wondering who could actually believe this. The I saw the "Not" in the comm name.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

I'm leaning towards either, "Fabricating The Onion," or "Puking The Onion." I think the first is a more accurate assessment of the situation though.

Edit: both my suggestions aren't any good next to "Picking/Plucking The Onion."

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're getting played by this misleading article. There is no evidence that anyone didn't sign the card because they didn't like her. If you follow the link to the actual article, there were two other people who didn't get cards either for the same reason. It's not in that articles, but I read elsewhere that because this happened during COVID it was just difficult to get people to sign them.

The woman sounds like a dope, but most people are kind and would sign the card anyway. Most people aren't looking to get petty revenge against people they don't even know that well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 166 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The judge added that Conaghan exhibited a "conspiracy-theory mentality" and misinterpreted "normal workplace interactions" as harassment. The example offered was when Conaghan wrote "whiz" in a coworker's card then claimed another colleague was copying her when they used "whizz" in a different card.

The Guardian reported she also complained after a coworker asked, "Are you taking the piss, Karen?," a popular British term meaning making fun of someone, after she claimed she was doing "all the hard work."

What a lovely person

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago

“Are you taking the piss, Karen?,” a popular British term meaning making fun of someone, after she claimed she was doing “all the hard work.”

In my experience, the people who complain about being the only ones doing all the hard work are the ones doing more complaining than actual working.

  • One would spend several hours almost daily chitchatting at other people's desks about how they are the hardest worker and things can only get done if they do it, they're the first in, last out, etc. But spends half their day complaining instead of working.

  • Another is a serial whiner who says no one else ever does anything, they have to do it all in order to get it done, yet they always have some excuse why they don't have to come in that day, or have to leave early, take a longer lunch, and spends a good chunk of their day gossiping.

[–] [email protected] 149 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Karen Conaghan sued the…

Ah, there it is

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wow, she is so Karen that her parents even named her that decades ago in the past - that's some dedicated Karening right there! (/s:-D)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As if she had no say on what her name is whatsoever! I personally always legally change my name whenever weirdos on the internet decide my name has suddenly bad connotations, I am at my 5th name this year and already looking for a new one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

They're Brits too, guaran-fuckin-teed they called her Cuntyhan behind her back

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Who's the actress on the right in that image? She looks familiar? Katy Perry?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

According to the caption under the picture, it's Emily Blunt..

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Imagine if they had text under pictures that described them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Trying very hard to imagine that

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

She's that lady who married the Unabomber from The Office

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago

It is Katy Perry's little known twin sister, Paty Kerry. Some people have given her the nick name of Emily Blunt, but that's not her real name.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (1 children)

[off topic?]

My boss's boss was named "Johnson." One day, I accidentally referred to him as "Jackson." None of the people I was talking to corrected me. I decided to try a little experiment and kept on using the wrong name. I used the wrong name dozens and dozens of times and never got called out.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Because you were silently judged. Behind your back. Always.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

my inner voice leaking

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Not familiar at all with UK law, but would it have been within the judge’s power to order a psychometric evaluation and you know possibly like a weeklong hospital stay with continued weekly visits to a psychiatrist?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

That generally requires them to demonstrate or threaten Self-harm

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If only we considered verbal and mental abuse to be harm. What am I saying, that's silly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Health care has been used as a weapon in the past… and thats not good…

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes every obnoxious and self absorbed person or difficult coworker on earth must be mentally ill.

Not every shitty character trait can be fixed like this, or is even worthy of fixing. Sometimes people are just assholes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're not wrong, Walter...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Eight year olds, Dude

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It usually doesn't yield any good results to force a person to visit a psychiatrist.

Unless, of course, they are having a psychosis and need to be medicated right now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I was kind of leaning in that direction. This woman is clearly divorced from reality to an unhealthy degree.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

Not her name literally being Karen though

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

I wonder why

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›