this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
512 points (98.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27234 readers
1333 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been unmotivated in the past but i think it's time to sort out an alternative.

(page 3) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because they're also going after piracy as hard as they can

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think about this a lot. In the 2000s, there would be all these music services that hype themselves up. The Downloadable Music Wars. We all used Napster or whatever pirating tool and it was just easier than paying. In the end, they were all smoke and mirrors and the services died out, while Apple and their iPods won.

In the late 2010s was the PC gaming Wars, Steam was really getting some heat. Not just other e-commerce stores like Epic, but also game streaming services like onLive and PC Game Pass. Again, all these wack ass companies (wtf Origin) and most of them have either folded or are on life support and migrated to Steam.

We're currently in the Streaming Wars. Probably the second or third version of this war, since the first war killed Blockbuster. I honestly don't believe many of them will survive past 2030. For sure Netflix and Hulu. Maybe half of them die, and six more will crop up. Who knows.

But what I do know is that whenever these "wars" occur, you see a lot of the shittier companies get worse and worse. And if you never picked a side and did your own thing (ignore them or sail the open seas), you get to look back and laugh at these clowns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Because companies want more money and people get used to it.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait till they drop you as a customer by cancelling your payment tier,then send you countless begging letters over the next month begging you to return. If you wanted my money that badly, why did you cancel me NETFLIX?????

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was at the fair and some lady was loudly announcing selling a streaming device that would stream all movies and shows for free. I asked how she could do that legally? She said Congress in 2011 passed the streaming act. Said any movie or show that is streamed once is by law afterwards public domain.

Someone should tell Disney Plus. Does anyone heard of this?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like some sovcit bs

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

What I was thinking. I.was trying to figure out how she was allowed to have a booth at the fair. Damn wish I taken a pic it was a large booth and she had several tvs up. It was definitely a streaming device that was pirating shows and movies.

I heard of these boxes online before but if I remember correctly they worked for a time before suddenly being blocked or whatever then you just have a brick of a device.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You might ditch, but they have enough data that says enough other people aren't going to.

Just remember whenever you're annoyed by something and think "why is this a thing? This annoys me so it shouldn't happen", there's thousands of other people who can live with it or just don't give a shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because the “you wouldn’t steal a car” nonsense scares a lot of people off

Because some people want to support the creators of content but digital downloads from iTunes or whatever are more expensive than getting a month of a streaming service

Because there is a level of convenience of having thousands of hours of content at your fingertips without having to store content locally or finding it on a “dodgy” website. Setting up torrents / usenet is more work than giving someone your credit card number

Because a lot of people don’t know where to find content and if they did they don’t know the difference between a 480p avi vs a 2160p HDR DV MKV and get confused with torrents and file formats and how to get them on their TV.

Because - at the moment - the ads aren’t that bad, I got one ad at the start and one episode in the middle of an episode of Gen V - obviously they’ll add more until it’s as bad as cable but they’re not there yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because - at the moment - the ads aren’t that bad, I got one ad at the start and one episode in the middle of an episode of Gen V - obviously they’ll add more until it’s as bad as cable but they’re not there yet.

Yeah, I stopped watching Fallout when it hit an ad in the middle. Why get excited about a show when it is clear that it will be constantly interrupted by ads like we still live in the 90s?

One is too many.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The "you wouldn't steal a car" thing actually backfired majorly for the parties involved. It actually did two things. It highlighted that downloading movies was possible and easy to do when it was new and not many people knew about it. And it made people curious. This led to it having the exact opposite effect of what was intended.

https://knowledgesource.com.au/no-bs-how-those-video-ads-spectacularly-back-fired/

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn’t they also not license (aka pirate lol) the music in that ad?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Also absolutely true.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Now do DARE or whatever that shot was 🤣

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Drugs
Are
Really
Expensive

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The only way we’re going to do anything about this is by actively avoiding buying or using products we see advertised on streaming sites. I already do this with Amazon Prime but I doubt they even notice. It’d be great if this became a thing at Christmas, it could completely destroy the revenue stream for these massive cunts.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

You are a statistic. The question isn't do you exist but how many of you exist. When there is enough money to be made by serving people like you with fewer ads someone will do it. Until then though you are not worth the money it costs too keep you so good riddance.

of course the above is why some demographics don't watch much tv. They somewhat care but not enough to serve those demographict.

may I suggest you take up tatting, mandolin, welding, bike riding... there are a long list of other things you can do with your time either on a theme/variation from above or not mentioned. These are all hobbies and you can find some to fill all that time you free o up.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Already lots of great answers, but I'll add a note about intentional barriers to exit.

Many services tend to make it easy to sign up and comparably more difficult to quit. So while people always can leave and take their business elsewhere, they might not have the motivation to do it. I imagine each additional click in a form deters more and more people. OP mentioned being unmotivated, and these barriers play into that.

It's like wandering around in Ikea. You could use a map and chart out the fastest route to find what you need and get out. But it's so much easier to follow the little path they draw out on the floor and look at everything, which makes you way more likely to impulsively buy something extra.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

They’re sure you will, or some will, but the number of customers they lose will be offset by the revenue gained.

Since that’s the only metric they really care about at the end of the day it makes “sense” to them to do it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Remember when Netflix was totally dead and doomed when they cracked down on password sharing? And then it turned out people just upgraded to the new plan and kept on consuming.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Which new plan?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Consumers do be fickle

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The economy is in a weird spot where data looks alright (employment and gdp) but the covid economy hit everyone including your friendly neighborhood corporation. Ads are a simple and reliable way to turn up profits in a soft economy and declining global situation and inflation. Since companies have effectively stolen wages for so many years they can't cope with modest wage spike on their bottom line or really any disruption anywhere in their business they use ads to print money. Maybe as time goes on business will benefit from slowing wage growth and increasing automation we will see ad growth scale back. Regulation would be nice but what are you going to do?

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2021/03/COVID-inequality-and-automation-acemoglu.htm

https://www.atlantafed.org/blogs/macroblog/2024/06/27/are-real-wages-catching-up

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Statistics. You're still there and only complaining. I purged all subscription parasites from my life in 2019.

I live by the abstraction, "you can't fix stupid in anyone else but yourself." All you can do is tell others what you did with your one wallet vote and hope that others do the same at some critical mass.

They do it because you're still there, and you care while they do not. You want to think you're human. You're not. You're a new deck chair on a yacht if you're lucky. Most likely, you're no more than a liter or few of diesel.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The answer is apathy.

You have to remember that most users simply don't care. The majority of consumers are some combination of either not technologically savvy or just outright intimidated by technology, are not very well educated, are incredibly reluctant to read, are not particularly observant, will not leave their routines or comfort zones without very significant motivation, and have spent their entire lives being the very frog in that gradually boiling pot of ever more numerous and intrusive advertising to the point that they just accept this as "normal." They're busy. They don't read tech headlines. They don't understand what's going on under the hood, and nor do they want to.

Normal people don't see the world like us nerds do. I am positive that these streaming services (and many other businesses) have studied this and understand it very well. If they lose 1% of their business which was made up by vocal nerds, but whatever odious change the just rolled out results in an increase in profit that is greater than the revenue from those subscriptions lost, they'll go ahead and do it anyway.

They think they have a captive audience because by and large they functionally do have a captive audience. This stuff works, and people keep paying for it en masse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Which is functionally a captive audience.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago

I mean, look at Reddit. Huge uproar last year, nothing happened really.

Pretty much every service, platform, app has become worse over the last two or three years. But people keep using them. And not for a lack of alternatives. They are actively hostile against change and many really don't care. They are so used to being fucked over, squeezed for pennies and bombarded with bullshit ads, that they gave up.

The same thing happens in politics, btw. People just vote whatever - if at all, because they already expected to be fucked over. All those activists you see on TV or online are a tiny minority.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

It’s always about the 💰💰💰they’re getting.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They don't care about you. They don't even want you as a subscriber, you're a pain in the ass. Most people are too tired and not tech savvy enough to pirate. A lot of those will eventually do something else, too, but they can cram ads into the streams faster than those people can find the wherewithal to leave.

In short, this is profitable, and no amount of raging will make it less so. Take care of yourself, but don't pretend you're making line go down.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I'm not saying I'm going to start a revolution. I'm only saying it's time to break the chain, again.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Pirates life for me

[–] [email protected] 204 points 2 months ago (5 children)

A: they’re betting most people will accept it, and they’re right. The same thing happened in the early 80s when cable television advertised themselves as the pay-for-ad-free service, then started sneaking ads in. People complained, sure, but we all saw the outcome. They got away with it.

B: Greed, capitalism, and fuck you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Cable television never advertised that. Cable TV started as a “community antenna” system that served people in valleys with existing off-the-air broadcast channels (which had ads); the existence of those systems created a market for satellite-fed channels like HBO (which was always a separate subscription and ad-free) and TBS/CNN (which always carried ads). Other than the premium channels like HBO/Showtime/Cinemax, cable channels have had ads from the beginning.

Once the small cable systems and the media publishers both got consolidated, we started seeing content licensing deals and higher costs to the subscriber to pay for it - but the channels (MTV, Nickelodeon, etc) always carried ads.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Yes and no. Networks had ads but cable began inserting their own ads in addition to the network ads. When I ran a company I did large media buys with cable companies. I would buy ads from the regional cable company which would air in between the national ads of Comedy Central, Discovery, etc.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It definitely did. I remember it vividly (I was alive back then). And I’m talking about the premium services, specifically (e: which was the point of my comparison: the premium paid services back then advertised no-ad service, then included ads, just like the premium streaming services are doing today).

Here’s an article from the NYT in 1981 on the topic:

WILL CABLE TV BE INVADED BY COMMERCIALS?

e: a quote:

Indeed, even pay television, once assumed to be secure from commercial interests, is attracting some attention as a potential vehicle for advertising. Admittedly, such leading pay cable services as Home Box Office and Showtime, whose programming consists primarily of theatrically released films, staunchly maintain that they will never accept advertising.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Literally the first sentence of that article:

Although cable television was never conceived of as television without commercial interruption, there has been a widespread impression - among the public, at least -that cable would be supported largely by viewers' monthly subscription fees.

The premium services mentioned in your quote (HBO, Showtime) also still do not run ads even today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 102 points 2 months ago (5 children)

A: they’re betting most people will accept it, and they’re right.

Yes. Remember when Netflix put a stop to password sharing and the internet went aflame with people declaring that Netflix had shot itself in the foot? Netflix subscriber counts went up.

The average person will put up with so much more of this nonsense than techie people will.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I already wasn't using them by then. I couldn't stop harder.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's why I highly recommend Fmovies, sudo-lol, and others. The barrier to entry is literally a browser and ublock origin and you can watch just about anything.

You can send someone a link to an episode and they can watch it. No sign ups, no ads (with ad block), and pretty decent service. No explaining what a torrent is. No VPN (though I recommend it of course).

Just pure content.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Subscriber counts went down in the affected areas.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's time to start shaming people who think like this

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey now, I don't think like this, but sometimes it's just not worth the effort to think unlike this.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Ye ol bait and switch

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i haven't had cable, or even a tv, in many years. stayed at a hotel the other day and flicked on the tv because the internet was out (helene), and was flabbergasted that for every 2 minutes of programming, there was at least 5 minutes of the same commercials over and over. people fucking watch this shit? on purpose?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

When my wife and I stay at a hotel we watch cable and put on like QVC shopping channels.

It’s fun to overreact and be like “this is 100 genuine silver painted lead.” Some of the channels will have like changing infographics that flash and explode every second as the price keeps dropping so we make wooshing sounds as it keeps falling to a new low.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Their entire survival hinges on keeping investment money flowing, which means they essentially have to lie and over-promise.

A chronic issue plaguing the entire tech and media sector right now. Line must go up no matter the costs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Because of the people they loose due to the price hike, more will stay for the new price.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›