4am

He’s gonna destroy the country anyway; fuck it in say we try. If the numbers in this article are accurate, then anomalies exist. Might as well find out if it’s a “nothing burger”

That is patently false. Encrypted email and patient portals are absolutely allowed under regulation.

What you have here is a practice that has probably been in operation since the 80s or before, and they refuse to change their ways.

I sure hope you meant plight of the Palestinians…

At this point she is bending the knee. The Democratic Party has already started pushing a “we lost because we ran on woke, Matt Gaetz will make a very reasonable attorney general” platform.

They’ve been in on it the whole time.

Make it UV reactive and you can kill the COVID while you’re at it

You cannot specify ports in a DNS A or AAAA record. www.example.com cannot resolve to 1.2.3.4:443 and app.domain.com cannot resolve to 1.2.3.4:5555

If the application (be it a game or whatnot) supports it, SRV records can identify a port for a hostname. So, you could have minecraft1.domain.com and an SRV record to specify port 25565, and minecraft2.domain.com SRV 25566.

This means you can have multiple Minecraft servers with the same IP address, but you won’t need to give people the port numbers to remember; the hostname allows the game to look up the port via the SRV record.

This is great for selfhosters because we generally only get one IP (until they rollout IPv6; probably half the reason they don’t)

Some of the shorts are ads themselves

I mean, maybe? Is anything there in particularly poor taste or is it just like “MacLaren got Minecraft TNTd” and “George Russel looks like Woody from Toy Story”?

Could just be good natured fun but I can’t see them all so can’t be sure it’s all in good taste.

I’m on FiOS and I just had to turn on IPv6 on my router (it’s disabled by default on older Quantum Gateways). It works and they are assigning /56 blocks, I think it’s DHCPv6 but I haven’t looked in a while.

MAC addresses are link-local device identifiers, used by the switches and routers and WiFi access points that talk directly to the devices in question. Switches and routers maintain a table of which MAC to send a packet to based on the IP address - I.e. which actual port to send the data frames down.

There is DHCP for IPv6, but the IPv6 stack is supposed to be able to detect which subnet it’s router is in and then just pick addresses on its own (it does look for conflicts before committing to an address). This is called SLACC (stateless address auto configuration).

NAT is unnecessary because there are so many addresses, as others have mentioned; but I did want to point out that NAT is not used for security. Just because it obscures your devices does not make them any safer. All IPS routers have a firewall to one degree or another (could be as simple as “no incoming connections”; which is bad and lazy but it happens). Firewalling - examining incoming traffic against a set of rules for allowing or denying - is the correct way to secure any network, IPv4 or IPv6.

No dumbass, they don’t just go away.