this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
285 points (94.4% liked)

Not The Onion

16947 readers
905 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Oh this aged like sour goat milk.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

That's some smooth manipulation right there. He just complained that he should have won it and they slyly nominated him. Expect lots of great favors for Pakistan going forward.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Fits right in with Obama, lord of drones.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago

Norwegian here. I can still hear the gasping from the laughter of the nobel committee in Oslo. And I'm on vacation abroad.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nobel committee knows that if they pick him, it would tarnish the prize.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Time: Person of the year, 2007

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Is it still a respected thing? I was under the impression it's not Obama didn't do anything except be elected and he was nominated. Can't remember if he won it though but that seems like pretty weak criteria to be nominated.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Obama did win, and it was for his commitments to green energy and climate change. It's widely considered bad to award people before they follow through to the end, especially for the nobel committee. I think they were trying to use it as further motivation to keep those commitments, but if anything it's usually the opposite.. at least when they give them to sociopath politicians. Could definitely be worse than Obama though.

Edit: Reading more on it, it looks like it was also for nuclear non-proliferation. I guess both are pretty valid awards for Obama, even if he could have done far more, especially in his first two years.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Kissinger won after setting a bunch of infants on fire. Obama winning for nothing wasn't the worst by a long shot.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

He won for not being Bush.

That's how terrible Bush was.

And Trump is even worse.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He was awarded and did a lot of un-peaceful things later on

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I hear some Oscar winners go on to work in some really un-oscar films -- and they didn't take the Oscars back. Similarly I had a great day on 14 Aug 1999 and some really un-good days after.

Is it okay to pick someone's best achievement and demand that excellence every day? Please answer how you're doing the same in your own life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not peaceful at all. I really think it's a bullshit award these days. Constant drone striking, basic bitch democrat Obama is the best this country can do? Maybe but I hope not

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Always has been 🏆🔫

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

As as to be said somehow literally every time these headlines are published, nominations for any Nobel prize are kept secret and announcing that you've submitted a nomination if anything makes them less likely to be accepted as it harms the nomination by harming the image of the nominator. Anyone can say they've nominated anyone for a Nobel Peace Prize and they can't be proven or disproven for 50 years.

Oh and "Pakistan" can't nominate anyone for a Nobel Prize. All you need to be a nominator for the Nobel Peace Prize is to be an elected official or a university professor, but you do have to be a person. The likely of a headline not bothering to distinguish between a person and their 250 million people nation seems to increase linearly with distance east from the Greenwich meridian.

https://www.nobelprize.org/nomination/questions-and-answers-about-the-nomination-process-for-a-nobel-peace-prize/

Please remember this when that Norwegian 'scientist' nominations Trump or Elon or whoever in October like he does every year.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Trump helped secure Pakistan-India ceasefire last month, preventing a broader conflict between the two nuclear

No he didnt, India has already said it was talks between India and Pakistan and Trump had zero to do with it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Well Hitler was nominated too. Sarcastically, by an anti-fashist, but he was nominated.

So one more thing they have in common now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

In other news, I hereby nominate my butt for the Nobel Peace Prize.

load more comments
view more: next ›