TheOctonaut

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yes absolutely they can

You know the purpose of this is so they can use them without being tracked though, right? If it's easy to exclude outliers and bad data, it makes this suggestion pretty useless.

As people have suggested, there's almost no reason to ever have this data leave your own personal device or network. Women have tracked their periods for thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nah they'll just say "weird. Guys, exclude November, it's an outlier".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

If you are required to install something like InTune by your company, that's what controls what apps you can install in Work mode. It's a good trade off because it enforces good separation for them - clipboard is blocked between profiles, data too - but also for me. One little toggle and those apps and the profile are disabled entirely until I care again tomorrow.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (5 children)

This is data analysis, not development. Yes you can just exclude the problem month, average the previous and next months, and her real data starts to contribute again. And yes you can do that regardless of who is writing code. Or even that the code was written by your company and not some other company you bought or seized data from.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume we didn't just pick up the newspaper in the shop, flick to the funnies, shake our heads at what Andy Cap was upto today, and then leg it before Mrs Murphy tried to get us to pay

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Luckily the truth is pretty far in the middle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yeah cool Malcolm, it's been 30 years, you don't need to give this speech every time uses it as shorthand for "in the context of our continued survival on it".

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, sure, but this assumes that the killing is completely indiscriminate.

It is, but it's important that you're clear on that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Right, but what can they do, short of banning small bottles of water?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Punishment? No. To get exactly what they actively chose to make happen? Of course.

Interesting that you'd frame "consequences if their actions" as "punishment". Because punishment is usually a consequence of your actions, while not all consequences are punishment.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't need to offer anything. I'm from a country with a parliament, ranked choice voting, proportional representation. But if you still don't get that not Trump should absolutely be better than "whatever, I guess", you deserve what's coming.

view more: next ›