this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
959 points (98.0% liked)

politics

22985 readers
4017 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a composition effect. Democratic candidates who run for safer, more left-wing constituencies feel free to propose more radical left-wing policies, especially if their main threats are other democrats during primaries. They then go on to win because they're not running in competitive elections. You can use the same reasoning to conclude that Republicans who attack abortion and socialism do better in elections.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't buy it. Red states hate billionaires even more than blue states. Centrist Democrats have nothing to offer to Republican voters to change their minds. Progressives speak directly to the economic issues that plague red states.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, red states elected a billionaire because he was a billionaire.

But Centrist Democrats think that if they just kick progressives harder, they'll gain the favor of the three remaining moderate Republicans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Red states hate billionaires even more than blue states

(citation needed)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Going to read the article now, but before doing so I'm wondering if they controlled for the fact that safer seats are more likely to be in a position to take stronger positions on it, or might be forced to take stronger positions on it because the primary threat is during the primary.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago (10 children)

nah, they're gonna make fun of Trump for being broke with childish nicknames instead. sink down to his level while making him sound more relatable to all the broke people they want to vote for them. sometimes i think they're trying to lose.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Anyone from poor decaying rural America has had enough conversations with republicans with oddly class related philosophies to feel this comment hard

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (52 children)

Their campaign is literally "It'll be worse under the other guy."

Losing now is the best way for them to win in four years. It is how it has been for decades. When's the last time one party held the presidency for two consecutive candidates? It's a neverending metronome, except the needle moves more to the right each time.

load more comments (52 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

But they won’t, because once they get into Congress they get just as tied to big money as any other politician. Plus, there all too busy trying to chase after Republican voters, even though they’ll never, ever vote for a Democrat.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Consume the wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. If a democrat ran up and garroted Jeff Bezos, or went all Tanya Harding on Elon Musk's knees, I would vote for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why multiple mics from the same station?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

A few things, more exposure/advertising space, and redundancy, especially in a time where mics were really inconsistent, if one mic goes down, you have another still recording.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So they can broadcast *in stereo*

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They won't. The party exists to serve the rich.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, they know, and it scares them.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There's a reason they sidelined Sanders when he would have easily won in 2016

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Almost all of the head to head polls Had Bernie doing better than Hillary

He also won the Wisconsin primary and the Michigan primary in spite of the DNC leadership and propaganda machine being firmly behind Hillary from the beginning.

Hillary lost those states, ultimately costing her the election, and there's no indication that Bernie would have lost any of the states she won.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

They singled out those two states because they were ones Hillary lost in the general

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Yup, he did, and he would have won the general.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This has been on my mind every time the DNC tries to position themselves as a party for the people. As far as I'm concerned, they showed their hand, and apparently they thought no one would notice.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

There is nowhere to run.

Democrats = the party of the rich
Republicans = the party of the rich
MAGA = the grift of the rich

We’re going to be voting for the lesser evil for at least a few more cycles. Doesn’t mean it’s a good idea not to vote though.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›