That's not how you petition the Supreme Court.
Yet another Republican "patriot" who flunked civics 101.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
That's not how you petition the Supreme Court.
Yet another Republican "patriot" who flunked civics 101.
I knew in my heart of hearts that this was coming.
How about we just stop honoring Republicans' right to marriage? They're all abusers anyway so it'd probably save some people's lives.
they just wanna 'ask'? and not do the actual dirty work (and unpopular--a majority of that state supports same-sex marriage) of writing and passing a state law that conflicts with obergefell, and then defending that law as it is challenged up the judicial ladder?
Iowa is so close to flipping blue. This is not going to stop that. This will never pass, but we always knew the geriatric old bitches in the GOP were going to try and bring it here.
Don't take anything for granted. Texas has been on the verge of going blue for years but people don't show up for midterms and the GOP has been doing their best to make the state unlivable unless you just enjoy suffering or watching others suffer. They'll also make any excuse to make voting harder unless you're in a rural county.
This is what they want more tolerance of, their bigotry. They're the ones dividing people and saying certain people shouldn't be treated with dignity. We need freedom from religion.
Bigotry is the only thing they seem to want tolerance of.
From the text of the resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SENATE, THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONCURRING, That the General Assembly of the State of Iowa rejects the decision of Obergefell v. Hodges ; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the General Assembly of the State of Iowa calls upon the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse the Obergefell decision, and restore the natural definition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman...
Does the Supreme Court even have the power to reverse a previous decision without a new case revisiting the issue?
And doesn’t it violate the separation of powers in multiple respects for a state legislature to tell the Supreme Court how to interpret the federal constitution?
They won't respect the "sanctity of marriage" by treating an immigrant spouse as a citizen... or respect marriage at all when they cheat on their wives while they're pregnant. They want to bring back state-sanctioned bigotry, that's it.
What Republicans have come to realize (and Democrats refuse to accept) is that you can just DO THINGS at the executive level. And if the bureaucrats follow along, then you've functionally established new policy.
The Iowa legislature can pass a rule saying "No more issuing marriage contracts to gay couples" and the state courts can say "Okay, we'll stop doing that and we'll also stop recognizing existing contracts", and all the low level county officials can just ignore the legal status of gay married families and then private businesses can follow suit. And then that's it. No SCOTUS decision is going to pay out on insurance benefits claims to a legally de-certified no-longer-spouse.
On the flip side, the Iowa legislature can author this act and the people of Iowa can rise up in protest and say "Fuck you, we won't do what you tell us." Private businesses can continue to honor marriage contracts. Low level bureaucrats can continue to treat gay couples as married. Mid-level bureaucrats can defend and promote them. High level bureaucrats who continue to force these abhorrent laws on people can be removed from office.
The problem is that... the fish rots from the head. More likely than not, we're seeing this push because Iowa's basket of deplorable plutocrats want to expand the number of minorities they can piss and shit all over. Just like how DOGE gutted the "Woke" federal bureaucracy, I suspect we're going to see Iowa state leadership tearing the spine out of any state or local government agency that refuses to accept gay rights are expired.
Do you have the courage to stand up to your boss? Do you have the support of your friends and coworkers to call a strike in a business that singles out the LGBTQ folks who work there? Will you march on your city council and demand they take your side or get out of the way? Will you march on your state house? Will you stare down a bunch of bigots in badges when you do it?
This is a big ask and its not easy to find enough folks willing to stand up for what is right.
This is not how SCOTUS decisions are handled. State legislatures passing resolutions (Oklahoma did this, too, right?) shouldn't be relevant to the Court at all. Of course, Thomas may well pen a response outlining exactly what fascists would need to do to get a winning case before the Court, as a treat.
Anyway, while this is painfully stupid, and certainly a test balloon, this carries zero weight whatsoever. We are in bizzaroland, though, so who knows.
Nothing better to do then this?
Trying to decide who gets to have a government approved contract for the thing people are going to do anyways?
What a bunch of do nothing waste of time assholes.
Yes but if they weren't spending all their time oppressing minority groups they'd have to solve actual problems and that's hard.
Cruelty is easy. It’s a fast and cheap way to pretend that they’re solving problems.
It’s all very “We’re miserable, so you have to be too.”
Abolish and criminalize religion
I'd rather not create thought crimes, or give the government a vague label to slap on any group of people they want to criminalize.
Instead of giving the state another avenue for oppression, what if we label religion as the disease that it is and work with mental health professionals to develop a treatment for it?
This could easily turn into another avenue for oppression. "Desginate x a mental illness and treat it" doesn't necessarily turn out any better than "Put all the practitioners of x in the gulag." So really you need to focus on overthrowing the authoritarians who want to oppress people.
Why not both?
Make it even simpler abolish organized religion. You're free to do whatever you want in the privacy of your home, but get rid of all the temples, churches, mosques, and synagogues. No tax exemptions for religious organizations either (and that one change would kill most Christian churches practically over night).
Jesus: everybody love each other. That’s it that’s the whole thing.
American Christians: what a ninny. We’re not doing that.
"The Bible says homosexuality is abhorrent."
"How many types of fabric are in that shirt?"
"... that passage is ambiguous!"
I bet they've eaten pork and shellfish too.
Cheeseburgers for sure.
The cheeseburger thing is rabbinical law.
It doesn’t say you can’t have a cheeseburger anywhere in any of those books.
It says “don’t cook a baby goat in its mother milk”
Rabbis extrapolated that to be : no cheeseburgers
Or "that's irrelevant!"
Pretty sure the Bible also says that the devil can pick and choose parts from it for his own purposes.
Aziraphale and Crowley looking at Jesus during the crucifixion.
Crowley: What was it he said that got everyone so upset?
Aziraphale: “Be kind to each other.”
Crowley: Oh, yeah. That'll do it.
In fairness, the thing he said that got everyone upset was "I am the King of Kings, abandon all your worldly ties and join me on a pilgrimage to the capital city of the Levant. I will fulfill the ancient prophecy of a new independent Jewish state blessed by the One True God who may or may not also be me, we'll sort that out in another 300 years."
But the "Good Omens" line makes for better dark comedy.
I mean it’s all a magical story about a dude who didn’t exist at all probably.
But the “teachings” exist.
Yet the American Christian resists the message but embraces the magic.