this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
352 points (98.6% liked)

politics

22373 readers
3951 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Party of taking personal responsibility here.

Traitorous assholes.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

That reminds me, I have to sharpen my guillotine this weekend.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I'm surprised Trump's DOJ would even seek prosecution against Dear Leader's flunkies to necessitate a pardon.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago

Couldn't even make it 3 months without doing a felony. Is that a record?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago (1 children)

”It didn’t happen. I haven’t heard of it. It wasn’t that bad. It wasn’t their fault. In any case, here’s my pardon.”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

If he uses autopen, it doesn't count

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago

"Why is everyone in MAGA going after Waltz when it was @PeteHegseth@SecDef that sent all the classified stuff?" posted former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), a longtime conservative critic of the president.

Why not both? Or all for that matter. They were ALL violating the Federal Records Act, a crime.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

To "Take the fall" don't you have to not be 100% at fault already?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I think they're referring to him being a scapegoat for the whole team. Common practice in Washington.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

They're all at fault for conducting any government business over signal.

That's where the fucking line is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Make SecDef go to rehab for 2 weeks for 'exhaustion'

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Don't you think he looks tired?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You can pardon people for treason against the gov that you put them in??

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Infinite get out of jail free card. Do felony, get a fall guy, pardon fall guy, rinse and repeat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Robert’s basically said every president from now on can do this.

They just openly don’t think there’ll ever be an opposition party to take advantage of it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I thought this was Ameritocracy ^TM^

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It’s only a few months in. I wonder if what is left of Trump considers bringing professionals back into the room. That’s how he got through his first term. He has children working for him that need an adult.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Trump and Elon have gone through their life just fucking everything up. Really turning everything into dog shit

They had teams of people running around behind them doing their best with the chaos they leave in their wake... But those people often took their idiotic ideas and tried to reverse or misdirect them

So these guys started seeing this protection from their own incompetence as an obstacle. So they put a lot of work into removing them and replacing them with yes men and true believers

Now, more than anything, Trump and Elon are confused. They're doing what they've always done, faster and more directly than ever - and they genuinely seem baffled that people keep getting angry at them

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

You see a bug, he sees a feature. What kind of government does he want? Just listen to him. Believe him the first time, as they say.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

His job is to sit and corrupt while also spouting insane and scary shit.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not a chance. Too old. Too senile.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

The "Joe Biden is too old" crowd is pretty quiet these days I've noticed.

[–] [email protected] 123 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Ok, pardon and keep Mr. Whiskeyleaks on your team. We'll just circle back to a new fuck up that's guaranteed to come as long as everyone in that chat group continues to hold their position.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Whiskeyleaks, holy shit...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

LMAO someone please make that website. Publish all the totally not classified classified stuff that this incompetent administration is going to leak. This definitely won't be the last time it happens.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Lmao. I actually laughed at this and my husband too, when I told him. Jesus christ, haha.

It's funny how so many of these nicknames are so obvious, but I never would have come up with them myself.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Let's make it happen. When you hear too much from the drunken bro:

https://imgflip.com/i/9on43h

https://imgflip.com/i/9on43h

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That’s the smirk of a guy who’s got a couple hookers in his basement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

They said they were 18!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

That's the smirk of a guy who bought the judge before committing the crime

[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Wake up, babe.

New time increment just dropped.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

For those out of the loop as I was: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_humorous_units_of_measurement#Scaramucci

A Scaramucci (or Mooch) is 11 (sometimes 10) days and is named after the length of White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci's tenure under President Trump.

Further reading, because I like further reading: https://web.archive.org/web/20190831011113/https://www.newyorker.com/news/ryan-lizza/anthony-scaramucci-called-me-to-unload-about-white-house-leakers-reince-priebus-and-steve-bannon

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

How many Scaramuccis are in a Hegseth?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What’s that in Scaramuccis?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

59 days of Hegseth workng for this admin ÷ 11 days per Scaramucci ≈ 5.36 Scaramuccis

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And how many heads of lettuce is that?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

59 / 49 = 1.2 Hegseconds / Truss.

Alternatively, the Truss / Scaramucci conversion would be 49 / 11 = 4.45