bamboo

Regardless of the altercation with the employee, is there no enforcement in that Section 60 rule which prohibits political campaigning? Why even have that if it's not enforced? Seems like this is just enabling a rabid base to be the attack dogs for an unhinged person running for president.

Not sure if it's what you're looking for, but I'd say the mystery of the dead bear cub in central park 10 years ago. This was minor news back then and basically was forgotten about, until RFK Jr. (former third party presidential candidate) admitted to being the person behind it, confessing it to a confused Roseanne Barr.

Not sure the genre or trope, but Poker Face (and 6 Feet Under), the additional subgenre for me is "who's gonna die in the first scene".

There's a whole Wikipedia article about the legality of it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutionality_of_the_National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

With this Supreme Court, my rule.of thumb is they will always pick the worst side of a debate, even if that goes against precedent and the constitution.

This is just a bandaid and the conservative justices on the supreme court will strike it down for some stupid reason.

I'm particularly interested in using the Don't Ask Me license

Probably not, the only hope prior to the election is the hush money case which is unblocked and will have sentencing in 2 weeks, on September 18th.

Here's a list of YouTube channels which have < 1M subscribers who probably deserve more views

• Almost Friday TV
• Bobby Fingers
• CinemaStix
• Dime Store Adventures
• Now You See It

What do you mean building our own systems?

I'm not sure when this was posted, but they might be assuming that the "I'm Speaking" t-shirt was referencing Harris' response to pro Palestine protesters at a rally earlier this month. I had certainly forgotten about the 2020 debates.

What's funny is at the time of the acquisition, Spiderman, Fantastic 4, and X-Men film rights were held by Sony and 20th Century Fox, but they are heavily featured in the image.

The TSA press office said in a statement that this vulnerability could not be used to access a KCM checkpoint because the TSA initiates a vetting process before issuing a KCM barcode to a new member. However, a KCM barcode is not required to use KCM checkpoints, as the TSO can enter an airline employee ID manually. After we informed the TSA of this, they deleted the section of their website that mentions manually entering an employee ID, and did not respond to our correction. We have confirmed that the interface used by TSOs still allows manual input of employee IDs.

TSA: lalala i can't hear you, everything is fine, no issue here