this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
903 points (99.3% liked)

politics

23594 readers
3078 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump has exempted himself from key ethics guidelines required under the Presidential Transition Act, which he signed into law in 2020.

By rejecting federal funding for his transition team, Trump avoids donor limits and disclosure requirements, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and transparency.

Critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and government watchdogs, warn that Trump’s refusal to submit an ethics plan undermines accountability and could open the door to corruption.

This move marks a break from precedent and has sparked alarm over potential personal enrichment during his presidency.

(page 4) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

“Americans expect and deserve a president who prioritizes the nation’s well-being over personal gain,” she added.

Yeah!

“They will not tolerate a president who abuses the powers of his office to line his own pockets.”

Weeeellllllll....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Toothless watchdogs is more like it

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"Open the door to corruption"? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago

I’m not surprised, but I am exasperated.

[–] [email protected] 117 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I’d be happy that Trump voters finally got what they deserve, but unfortunately, the rest of us have to suffer the consequences alongside them. As well as the rest of the world.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (17 children)

I don't know why, but most of the world voting their political parties into power is trending to the conservative right not towards the progressive left.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

To the people who will wake up tomorrow pretending this is going to be buisness as usual. Fuck you. That's all.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

Raise alarms? Could open the door to corruption? Undermine accountability?

Where the Hell have these people been? And anybody who is shocked by these headlines needs to come out from under their rock. None of this is new or news. It’s SOP.

As for accountability and watchdogs? Can you be any more lip service? What is anybody going to do? Ever? They had four years to make Trump and team accountable. Hasn’t exactly worked out.

Wake me when September (2028) ends.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The most blatant act of "rules for thee, but not for me." My brother in Christ, you wrote the act.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

"i didn't read that. it don't count." -djt, probably.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How is this allowed under an act of congress? Oh right, lack of accountability and oversight.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

there was only going to be 'accountability' if democrats didn't follow it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Don't let any of them have access to briefings or classified materials. Period. Not cleared, you have no access. You fuckers will do whatever you want after in office, but right now the current administration should not fuck around. Fuck these assholes. Let them catch up later. Its not like it will cause any more damage to our country if they don't have access before then.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Isn't the President granted super-whatever clearance, through? I can just imagine Donny calling for some ridiculously secret files and just whipping out his phone to snap some pics of them "for a friend". At this point, I'm not convinced anyone would actually stop him!

[–] [email protected] 72 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Alarm! Concern! Criticism! Hand-wringing!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

we are well past the point of hand-wringing. this calls for a strongly worded letter

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

Furrowed brows!

[–] [email protected] 84 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and government watchdogs, warn that Trump’s refusal to submit an ethics plan undermines accountability and could open the door to corruption.

Fucking could? It's kinda been proven that he is corrupt and this is the best the watchdogs can do? Where's their teeth?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 months ago

Not even kinda proven! It's 100 fucking percent proven he's corrupt. The man was found guilty of 34 felonies. He's been doing this shit literally for decades... Fucking pussies...

[–] [email protected] 308 points 5 months ago (14 children)

lol. Watchdogs. Hilarious. Let me know when we have a government again.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 5 months ago (2 children)

it usually takes 4-6 years or so for democrats to fix most of whatever republciants screw up.

donvict part 1 will take a generation, at least.

donvict part 2 will take a lot longer and require practically-impossible coordination and commitment to get non-republicants to the levels of representation needed for amendment ratifications and impeachments.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (9 children)

it usually takes 4-6 years or so for democrats to fix most of whatever republciants screw up.

Liberals never actually fix what conservatives screw up. We never closed Gitmo and we still have troops based in Iraq. We never actually ended the War on Drugs (which has left Republicans a loophole to ban contraceptives by listing them as controlled substances). We never truly repealed Jim Crow and much of the country still relies on forced labor even in liberal bastions like California or New York.

Trump's just pulling back the curtain on how much has rotted.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 138 points 5 months ago (5 children)

And what are they going to do about it? If breaking the oath bears no teeth, the oath is pointless.

I face more punishment breaking my Paladin oath in Baldurs Gate 3...

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Just like all checks and balances in government, it assumes the branches are somewhat independent and ethical, at least claim to serve their constituents, and protect their own power. It’s up to the legislative branch or the judicial branch

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago

The one thing we can absolutely be sure of is that this dispicable con-man will do all that he can to enrich himself, without regard for any limiting principle or structural restraint.

Its not a question of "if" he "may" be corrupt, but only how brazen the supposed patriots in the Republican party will let him be as he does it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›