381
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
381 points (99.7% liked)
politics
19096 readers
3395 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Dang, I remember a time when the Anonymous hacking group was a force for good....
Are you actually dumb enough to think they are the same group
I'm gonna vote even harder
Fill in all the circle.
The linked CNN article has more information: https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/15/politics/wisconsin-voter-intimidation-text/index.html
Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman. Guaranteed they’re behind this.
Almost certainly. How many times have they been busted for this now?
I trust that our college students are smart enough to see through this bullshit.
I wouldn’t have 20 years ago when I was in college. Somehow I don’t think it’s gotten better.
Really? You would trust a random text telling you that you will go to prison for participating in a cornerstone of our democracy? The internet existed 20 years ago... You really wouldn't have thought to double check?
You also have to consider a twenty year old and just running with the possibility. They don't care if it's necessarily true. They don't have enough experience to know it's probably not true.
I suspect more people were highly suspicious of any text from an unknown number 20 years ago.
Caller ID was not in everyone's phone 20 years ago. There were a lot more random cold calls.
Calls sure, but texts are different, at that point you paid per text, people you texted you typically knew, spam was mostly still calls
We are really failing our children then.
20 years ago, you wouldn't have expected to have social media / internet help you determine whether a threat was real.
We had real news back then though, and many of us watched it. We knew Bush was a dangerous moron who wanted wars. And we knew Nader was a spoiler, but enough of my idiot classmates still voted against Gore. I was dumbfounded when they would admit it with a shrug. So much so that it has still stuck with me to this day.
There’s no such thing as “anonymous” texts — just texts the government can’t be bothered to trace back to their origin.
There was the one case with the scammers in the UK using a homemade cell tower to essentially send out phishing texts directly to cell phones in an area, completely bypassing the phone company. It seems like this scare texts scenario would fit that kind of tech even better, as you only need to send out a message once to a large amount of people and you don't need to collect information in response like in a phishing scenario.
Well you can send people "SMS" messages from an email system; if you know who the carrier on that number is. usually it's [the phone number]@[their service].
it's not hard to find what the domain name for the email transfer service is, and who owns which cell phone, and they can just buy a list of phone numbers that ping off college cells under specific circumstances that would indicate they're college students.
I receive spam texts from bullshit emails all the time.
Yup.
And you can have an email server in some Latin American country who doesn’t give a fuck (and why should they?) and basically create a new domain when ever you get shut down for spammy spam.
Server? In Latin America?? Jajajajaja
This guy right here officer ^
I know this type of information from an IT help desk job. Medical IT. Shit gets weird in hospitals.
Yeah, I used to use it to send out 2 factor setup links for RSA. Users standardly couldn't get their work email on their work phone until they were enrolled in Intune, so new users, or users who handnt already set up Windows Hello, I'd just grab their ISP from the cell phone distribution list or ask them if it was a personal phone and send it through att or Verizon etc.
What, he works in marketing?
WHO!? Who could POSSIBLY be behind such a text!?!? It is beyond fathoming. There certainly isn't a correlation between education and voting lines, or else one party would surely be trying to destroy the education system and bring religion back into schools!
Anonymous my ass.
Also, political intimidation and threats of violence are terrorism, and these people should be tried as such.
Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Raw Story:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.rawstory.com/wisconsin-voter-intimidation/