this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
278 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3786 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

I would be just as open to the idea that Trump doesn't pay attention to any detail about a person interviewing him if he isn't interested in them for some reason (say, an attractive female). But we can go all the way back to Tim Apple to show that he's not playing with a full set / deck; we don't need this guy to confirm that. Not that it'll matter to his base.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (3 children)

To be fair, he must meet thousands of people in a day when he is doing events. Nobody remembers every npc, some people are just to dull, uninteresting or just fall into the background noise.

With that said, given his age it is probably not wrong in that he has severe memory issues. In other news the sky is blue...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

some people are just to dull

You're saying some people are there just to dull things out?

That's a weird job.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm the kind of guy who show up to project mobilization to set things off and give the hardware my seal of approval. When the crews take the hardware out to the field, I travel home and monitor the operational status of the equipment from there.

This means that I meet "everyone" but I never spend much time with any of them. I am already pretty bad at remembering names, but this style of work really doesn't help - meeting them for five days, once per year. And we're talking maybe 100 people total across the entire company.

I can't imagine how one would remember thousands of names and faces after meeting them for a few minutes between rallies. To you it's the meeting of a lifetime. To Trump it's just another day. Of course he doesn't remember you.

Don't get me wrong, he's still a piece of shit, though.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

I expect we'll see Sinclair local news stations all talking about this tomorrow.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Suddenly makes a lot more sense:

"It's possible I have a picture with them because I have a picture with everybody. I don’t know them. I don’t know about them. I don’t know what they do."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/23/impeachment-hearings-times-trump-said-he-didnt-know-acquaintances/4253186002/

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I hope you're being sarcastic. He's used the "I don't know them" excuse for a long, long time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He only seems to remember people who kiss his ass or have talked shit directly to his face.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

He confused Nikki Haley and Nancy Pelosi, so no, he's just an idiot.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 months ago (1 children)

ngl I’d probably forget them too. Fuck trump anyway.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, fuck Trump but forgetting a guy who interviewed you months before does not sound like a good example of severe memory loss. Sounds more like the guy who already made some money by writing books on Trump is now back to try and make some more and needs to remind people who he is. So fuck him too

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago

And then you've got salon trying to shovel Variety's bait for clicks. Parasites from top to bottom.

[–] [email protected] 102 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Republicans voted Reagan in twice so it doesn’t really matter.