this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
419 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

14627 readers
553 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

calm down man, there is an invisible and pretty large mole hill in the middle.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

That makes it even worse

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I wonder how universal it is that my brain can't read "calm down, calm down" without it being in a Scouse accent

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Is your brain wearing a shell suit as it does that?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Dunno about universal, but UK-wide certainly

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hyperbolic-earthers approve.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Mmmm, pringles!

[–] [email protected] 52 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Its possible in 3 spacial dimensions, which last time I checked is the number of dimensions we exist in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That wouldn't project onto a 2D surface as a square though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

An isometric projection of a regular tetrahedron could absolutely be a square.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Grrr...yes. You're right. Isometrically.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In theory yes, but in practice those 4 people would be standing on a plane (i.e. Ground).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

You never hang with the homies in the ISS?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

Yep, it's a regular triangular pyramid.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Could rotate it so it looks square ish

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I also don’t see a problem. I have however found an error.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

print out the meme and highlight it using highlighter

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Maybe they’re standing on a sphere.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That would make it even less possible

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How do you figure? Make a tetrahedron of the points. Form a sphere around the points. Everyone is equidistant.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Ah, I was thinking of curved space over the surface of the sphere. Right you are. No need for me to start getting non-Euclidean

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

flat-earthers hate this one proof.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

hyperbolic-earthers you mean :D

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I love science memes, but this is just silly. It's so obviously "at least" 1.5 meters. If you're in this exact formation, you are 1.5m from 2 people... and about 2.12m from the other one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then why not write >= 1.5m? Check mate atheist

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Because it's implied...? The graphic is based on health experts' advice that people stay at least 1.5 meters apart, not that they stay exactly 1.5 meters apart with weird synchronized movements.

Sorry, I'm doubling-down on my argument! But the real reason is probably because not everyone knows what > and < mean...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's a minimum separation guideline not a a description of a geometry.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ooooh that's why people were angry. I didn't have to follow them anytime from 1.5m ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I don't know why, but my Lemmy client is insisting that I haven't read your reply yet even though I've marked it red five times. So now I'm responding

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

No, stop spreading misinformation! Because of you people will not be in the right positions and get covid. Downvoted.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Pythagoras wasn't the first to describe the relationship and he didn't prove it mathematically, but he still got his name attached to it for centuries.

That's life goal stuff right there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Kind of like Lou Gehrig... lucky SOB did nothing, yet will be forever immortalized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

As he said, he was the luckiest man ~~alive~~ on the face of the Earth.