this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
310 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

23567 readers
1094 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

As someone working on wrapping up my bachelor's in software engineering... Yeah... Fuck frameworks.

Everything I've been taught thus far has been nice, neat, logical code that has been explained completely. How does memory get allocated for that string? What exactly is a memory stack? How do pointers work? It all just made sense.

Then I get to the last 10 classes of my degree, and as a prerequisite for the last 9 I got treated to "java frameworks". The classwork essentially teaches me to explicitly ignore how the framework accomplishes the end result, and to instead focus on memorizing bullshit one-line commands that are specific to whatever jackass framework I'm working in.

I've spent like 3 weeks straight watching crash course after crash course, trying to find anyone that actually explains the fundamentals of frameworks. Best I could find was an explanation of MVC (model/view/control), but I still don't see how all that bullshit is easier that writing your own code!!

Fuck frameworks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ok the wild thing is when I open this website in my Lemmy app it doesn't display most of the text... There is a white background instead of black, so the white text doesn't display.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Strange; the page is shilling for a product that doesn’t use raw HTML for its site.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I had been looking for how to add Expandable sections using HTML.

Couldn't find it when I googled it.
Now, after almost a year of having given up, found it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Aside from the misguided part about AI, this is hilarious!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Agreed, the AI part is questionable, I linked it mpstly because it's mostly funny, plus I learned something new, tho I defo wouldn't take it too seriously.

Also, no marquee :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought marquee and blink were unofficial syntax??

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

you have an animated tattoo?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

The joke doesn't really work if you look too closely.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My Tailwind gang is awfully quiet today 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

it's either love it or hate it situation.

For the record, I love tailwind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'll be your data point on the other side of the record: Tailwind is the worst thing to happen to the web.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I have to use Bootstrap at work and I'm really not a fan. It's somehow more work than writing CSS from scratch.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I honestly just find the extra layers to make it harder for me to know what my code is doing. I'd rather set proper CSS margin-bottom than mb-1. Having to learn the Bootstrap way of doing things when I already know the traditional way mostly feels like a waste of my time. It's not, but it's hard to stay engaged when I can already do a thing in a more standardised way.

Kind of like a site I've been stripping the jQuery out of. You don't need that to show/hide a couple of form fields, FFS. Or the special JS library for doing pop overs. Come on, there's three fields on the entire website that use them, just use HTML5 popovers.

I imagine Bootstrap is probably more useful for stuff where more complex layouts are needed, or when a site needs to be more responsive to different browser shapes (as in desktop vs. various mobile form factors).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, just copy shit other people made with minimal changes. Problem solved.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I can use Bootstrap, much like I can write CSS, I just don't think it's a good use of my time.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm a huge fan of bootstrap and I feel that writing CSS from scratch is much harder.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm glad someone does! I don't like disliking it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"... I don't like disliking it." You and I have very different life experiences.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a lot of things I detest - bananas, generic medieval fantasy settings, reality TV. My life isn't better for disliking them, it's just the unfortunate reality of my character.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. My life is also not better for disliking things, but I really LIKE disliking those things.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

give yourself a treat every time you use it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

And ring a bell

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't do much frontend work these days, but years ago, it felt like the defining feature of Bootstrap was the 12-column layout. Sure, it had fun buttons and other components, but the ability to trivially define multi-column layout without ripping your hair out was its raison d'être.

Now that we have flexbox, I'm not sure anyone needs Bootstrap.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It also has lots of UI widgets like collapsing elements, modals and alerts. Sure, you could code all these by hand, but why bother?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

All the elements you mentioned are natove HTML elements that don't need any library.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes but it wasn’t always the case. Bootstrap used to be very helpful when grids, modals, accordions and so on were not standard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What’s a native HTML element that mimics Bootstraps Collapse?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was going to list a whole bunch of things the DETAILS tag doesn’t allow, but it seems that none of these issues actually appear. So either it has evolved since I’ve looked at it last time or I was stupid.

Either way, thanks for talking back.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I had to look it up myself - so I learned about it too!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

many native elements either do not function like people want or cannot be styled the same

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Can you elaborate? Give some examples?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

We have better alternatives today as well and still I see people choosing Bootstrap and violently cringe.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Mainly because I already understand CSS and HTML and having to learn their way of doing things is extra work and overhead.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m kind of surprised to see its name. Was fairly widespread back in angular/backbone days – I kind of assumed all the useful stuff from it got adopted natively as I haven’t really heard any frontend teams I’ve worked with over the recent years mention it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

I used it a little in a recent project, but I'm mostly a backend dev and am new to front end. When I Googlef how to make stuff pretty or improve UI, a lot of results were still related to Bootstrap, probably because it was so ubiquitous for so many years.