this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
46 points (88.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31518 readers
1155 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just finished reading an article about how raw alfalfa sprouts easily spread e-coli, but the problem could be solved by irradiation. So why don’t we?

After all, the US is the land of GMO, pesticides, washed eggs, chlorinated chicken, and pasteurized dairy. How could irradiated produce be any worse?

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We learned our lesson with the Grapefruit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What happened with the grapefruit?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

It used to be a cumquat.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Do you want to turn the frickin' frogs gay? Because that's how you turn the frickin' frogs gay.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

We do, it's called "cold pasteurization".

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (4 children)
  1. We do! Or, at least we are allowed to. I’m mostly aware of it being done with meats.
  2. The FDA requires that irradiated foods bear… the statement “Treated with radiation”…

  3. The word “radiation” is scary to the general public. It conjures thoughts of glowing rocks and nuclear fallout. It makes folk imagine that their food might be radioactive.
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My brother runs away from the microwave whenever my parents turn it on... 🤣🤦‍♂️

Did I mention he's vaccine skeptical?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t irradiation also affect the good bacteria? Like would one still be able to ferment it?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it affects the good bacteria. You can't make ginger bug with irradiated ginger for instance.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Yes, though it does not affect the nutritive content or prevent subsequent cultures from taking root, so you can still inoculate irradiated foodstuffs with live ginger bug, yeast, scoby, mother, etc. or open air ferment.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes the myth that irradiating something makes it radioactive is a very persistent one.

The reason radioactive material is so dangerous, is because it has the tendency to spread around. Not the radiation, but the material itself. Then people get exposed to that radiation and hurt themselves. There is a particularly tragic accident that happened in 1987 in Brazil where thousands of people got exposed to a stolen radioactive material. Especially when the material sheds dust it's very dangerous because it can then easily be ingested and even low levels of radiation which normally wouldn't penetrate the skin can cause issues inside the body.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goi%C3%A2nia_accident

Another reason the myth persists is because high enough levels of radiation can cause other materials to become radioactive. However on Earth this is only the case inside of fission and fusion nuclear reactors. And the source of a lot of the radioactive waste. But outside of that, nothing on Earth will make another thing become radioactive.

I know a lot of the food used in the military is normally irradiated. This allows for a long shelf life, which is particularly useful if you are ~~killing kids~~ spreading freedom on the other side of the world.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't be bothered if the label said my food might me a bit radioactive. But I imagine dragons would.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

🧐 Subtle. Accepted.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We do kind of irradiate some of our foods, but it's weak radiation like UV.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

We do if you are a dustmite

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't think it's physically possible for Americans or any other human to radiate food out of themselves.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Ukraine radiates food all over Europe and Africa - metaphorically speaking. At least, they did prior to the Russo-Ukraine war. Don't know if they do anymore.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I eat a lot of certain aliums and/or spices, you will definitely find it radiating out of me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What a rad person you are!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

You roentgent a contradictory response out of me, even if you try to Curie favor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I'm pretty sure plenty of you actually sweat gravy based on the size of them

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We do irradiate various foods, have been doing it for many years. The commenters who immediately started ranting about "how stupid we are" didn't seem to check first. I first learned that we did it with strawberries and a few other things many years ago (in the 90's maybe), but never bothered to looked up exactly what all foods we irradiate. So I don't know about alfalfa sprouts, but I suppose there are probably reasons why it's done with some things and not others, such as which ones it's safer and/or more effective on, and how it affects the quality of different foods.

The FDA first approved the use of irradiation in 1963 to kill pests in wheat and flour. To date, the FDA and the USDA have approved food irradiation for use on fruits, vegetables, spices, raw poultry, and red meats. https://www.fsis.usda.gov/food-safety/safe-food-handling-and-preparation/food-safety-basics/irradiation-and-food-safety-faq

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We can, but I suspect we don't because the disclosure requirements would hurt sales. Without massive public education campaigns to convince people that it's not as stupid as letting kids play with Xray machines every time they went to the shoe store up until the 1970s, people will be unsure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe-fitting_fluoroscope

Since ionizing radiation from medical procedures, nuclear weapons and reactors is a known cause of cancer [ www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation ], it would be quite a project to get the entire US public to believe that exposing your food to the process is different than exposing your body to it.

https://www.fsis.usda.gov/food-safety/safe-food-handling-and-preparation/food-safety-basics/irradiation-and-food-safety-faq

Irradiated foods can be recognized by the presence of the international symbol for irradiation on the packaging along with the words "Treated with Radiation," or "Treated by Irradiation."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Because we're stupid. Like on an institutional, industrialized level of just dumb motherfuckers. Intentionally so as a policy choice by our government.

It could literally be the cure to all foodborne illness and half this country would be howling like rabid baboons about how it's unnatural and it morphs the DNA of the irradiated item so that it it gives you super aids and makes you transgender.

Don't waste your time worrying about us. We're breathtakingly fucking stupid and arrogantly proud of it. Just let us die. Little of value will be lost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

This comment proves its own argument.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What a nothing comment. With so many food safety laws this is just nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

removed please. We've just watched a failed game show host president destroy a century of US Economic Hegemony because the stupid son of a removed doesn't know how tariffs work and half the country is cheering him on.

You cannot win this one. Don't waste your time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One president doesn’t make all law cease to exist. Removed? More like blocked for being aggressively ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No that wasn't me. Stupid Automod bullshit in here.

I used the word "ibtch". Flip the 2 first letters.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't think I've ever had the word bitch be filtered for me, is that a .ml thing? Or maybe it'll filter in this comment.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

It is indeed a .ml thing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

It is an .ml thing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I honestly don't know. But it happens occasionally. Not sweating it yet. But a slow creep of redditfication is showing a bit.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Its just .ml

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

there it is

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

because Americans think they will get cancer from anything that has radiation attached to it. Because we're science illiterate and the rich find it easier to control idiots.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I would say call it "ion pasteurization" or something like that, but considering some people want raw milk that wouldn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

It's already called "cold pasteurization."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That sounds too sciency for most Americans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

There's a small (and best of all free) museum in Philly called the Science History Institute.

Until a couple years ago, it went by the Chemical Heritage Foundation

Which I personally thought was a much cooler name.

Officially the name change was to reflect that their focus includes more than just chemistry,

But I have a sneaking suspicion that a big part of the reason for the change was that the old name just kind of creeped people out, and I'll admit it had a bit of a mad scientist ring to it.

Anyway, cool little museum for anyone who finds themselves in Philly, do recommend.