this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
605 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23594 readers
3140 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Barack Obama sharply criticized Donald Trump’s presidency during a speech at Hamilton College, condemning attacks on the press, immigration crackdowns, and threats to civil liberties.

He called it “unimaginable” that Trump’s actions—such as barring the AP and threatening law firms—would have been tolerated under past presidents.

Obama warned that Trump’s behavior, though “goofy,” poses real danger, and he labeled Trump a “wannabe dictator.”

He also referenced former Trump aide John Kelly's “fascist” remark and urged Americans not to mistake chaos for leadership.

(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WuceBrillis@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

https://archive.ph/QbtHO

This is the archived version of the article, no paywall.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Just call him for what he is, A russia agent, Krasnov Trump.

And stop calling them Presidents, they are public servant. re-label the term to "Head Public Servant".
So that everyone is reminded everyday who they are supposed to serve.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Larry Niven's scifi series had a species named Puppeteers where the leader was called the "Hindmost" because nobody wanted the gig. I think the leader's job was to draw off the predators or something like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Barrack gave us trump when he let home owners eat shit and the bankers walk free. Even Bush was going to give home owners some reprieve, and asked Obama if he wanted to proceed and Obama told him " there is only one president at a time". When he came in to power, he bailed out the banks.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He campaigned explicitly on a platform of change and then proceeded to install a cast of deeply entrenched establishment figures to shore up the establishment at the expense of common people. Classic switcheroo.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You could listen to him. He was the only decent president You had in my memory.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh my god shut the fuck up about it being “unimaginable”. They published the playbook online for anyone to see in 2020. They said they would follow the playbook. They are now following the playbook. They are completing sections of the playbook as written. They will continue to complete sections of the playbook as written, until they are either done executing the playbook, or removed from power somehow. None of this is a surprise. You are not allowed to be surprised by this.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 70 points 1 month ago

This is a straw man. Obama was not saying that nobody knew what project 2025 was planning. He's saying that prior presidents could never have gotten away with behaving in ways that Trump behaves, and doing things that Trump does.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago (6 children)

he labeled Trump a “wannabe dictator.”

Sure wish Democrats would quit downplaying the threat.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I agree. It's absolutely fucking infuriating.

"Aggressively and rapidly installing himself as a dictator" would still be understating a bit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] elatedCatfish@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would love to vote for this Obama guy if he has the chance to run again. Do it, Republicans. No balls.

[–] fake_meows@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's the funny part: if Trump and the supreme court somehow finagle a new legal loophole for the constitution, then Obama will get elected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Rally the troops Obama. Do something about it.

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If any President in recent history should return for a third term, I’d vote for Obama again in a heartbeat.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was rooting for a Jimmy Carter second term but that’ll be tough now.

[–] vinnymac@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do undead presidents act as a third term loophole?

[–] fake_meows@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Even if he wasn't undead, it would be SUCH an upgrade.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 70 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah bruh. It was imaginable. I fucking imagined it. Because it was goddamn obvious.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

it lowkey became inevitable when the democrats didn't make blocking trump from ever being president their #1 focus

[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago

Became inevitable when democrats ran Biden the first time… anyone with two brain cells could tell a Biden that doesn’t deliver some absolutely insane legislation was done. He even ran on being a one term president. He needed to stay on that path hard and allow a real primary group to form so there were competing ideas out against Trump. Saying everything is great in the face of massive inflation isn’t really going to cut it.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 97 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Good, start the campaign now so that if Trump somehow crowbars in a law that allows him to run for a third term Obama can bury him

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Crowbars in a law? Why not just do it? Who will stop him?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 65 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't see that as a fix. A third term for either would be a higher level constitutional crisis than all the many ones trump has already initiated. Many failed like with his first impeachment for misappropriating federal funds to bribe a foreign official.

[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone assumes Obama would easily win. I don’t think that’s a foregone conclusion. It would just make the third term fully legitimized.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only reason we have a 22nd amendment is because the shitheels were mad they didn't get a turn. They could have stopped being shitheels, but that's just out of the question.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Its something they should have put into the original consitution. They were never supposed to be careers. Given the terms of the various branches they should have maxed 12 years in any federal role besides judicial and that should have had a retirement cut off of 60.

[–] monarch@preferred.social 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Maybe a hot take but career politicians are something that make sense in a democracy that is properly functioning. If a politician is sure that they won't have to go work in industry after they are out of office they are less likely to feel the need to bend to the will of the oligarchs. But that is not how it has worked out so the idea itself seems much worse than it inherently is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Besides the fact that Trump has already telegraphed a possible plan to allow for three terms only if they're non-consecutive.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 23 points 1 month ago

I mean thats great but it should not be allowed any more than any presidential law break is allowed. The solution is not to go with it and also do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments