this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
370 points (98.9% liked)

politics

22053 readers
3796 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So,

  1. What an absolutely bitch ass snowflake move.

  2. Well good luck with that and going to be funny when people are still pissed.

What a utter pathetic snowflake.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

The “town hall” tem generally connotes...

Fuck the rep and all, but what is happening in this article? Spelling and grammatic issues all over the place...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

Boy, it’s a good thing there aren’t vets that voted R (or other non-insane R’s) that will totally stay home and be quiet.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 20 hours ago

So less "town hall" and more "klan rally" - got it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Echo chamber effect. Dumbass.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

I'm in a town hall rn. Waiting for it to start anyway. My rep is a dem, and guess what? No restrictions on attendees. Imagine that!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Ahh yes, a true representative of the people! 🥴

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"GOP rep discontinues town halls, switches to private party meetings"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

"GOP rep discontinues private party meetings, switches to private prerecorded video Q&A on X"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can't you just say you are one and walk in? Idk how they check that if you never registered.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I had to check in at the door at my reps town hall in nys.. There was a list of folks that rsvp. I got the invite by email, so I bet it's based on voter registration, and if you walk up at aren't registered R, no dice.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

They'll just fill the place with known loyalists, party officials, and MAGA social media influencers, denying access to actual republican voters.

They'll be quiet and listen to their master like good little boys and girls, and then they'll go on social media and say "see? our town hall was full of republicans and it was peaceful! your town hall must have been infiltrated by socialists!"

The town hall outrage will just become another charade, if it hasn't already, very very soon.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm sure there will be a lot of, well, let's say "visual inspection" going on to enter these town halls, if you catch my drift. It probably won't matter if you claim to be a Republican but are brown, black, female, or under the age of 50.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Party registration is public data in Arizona. They provide a ton of data, actually. A lot of states just provide name and party affiliation and maybe zip code or whatever. But you can often just buy it.

If they required people to RSVP, it’d probably be pretty easy for a political party to cross reference and check ID. (It seems Arizona sells the list to political parties and mere citizens have the right to inspect the voter rolls. Whatever that means.)

Source: https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/access-to-and-use-of-voter-registration-lists

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Come on, they're just simple dress code requirements

Business casual: red cap, formal: white hood

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

With or without the eye holes?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Straight cis white male liberals rise up - it looks like there's a problem to solve and the minorities can't solve it themselves.

It's the opportunity you've been waiting for!

(This is ribbing in jest. Allies are awesome)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Finally, an opportunity in life

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Looks like it's my time to shine.

[–] [email protected] 158 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I wonder how this is legal? Sounds like taxation without representation.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago

The republicans do 'representation for no taxation' but only for a select few

[–] [email protected] 25 points 21 hours ago

DC: first time?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"taxation without representation" I believe was a slogan, not a legally binding principle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

I get ya. It was a rallying cry for revolution, not really anything that ended up in writing as law.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Unless the town hall is paid for with taxpayer dollars or held on government property, it's a citizen who happens to be in Congress having a private event with their political supporters.

Same as a political party convention or fundraiser dinner,.AFAIK.

(And, depending on state law, even a function on government property may be legally private.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Even on government property, there's exceptions. Like a private study room at the library.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

14 upvotes? Take a civics class you schmucks, Jesus tapdancing Christ

[–] [email protected] -4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So, what rule do you think makes "congressional town halls" work differently than any other campaign activity?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago

I think the main point is that non-republicans are still forced to pay taxes, but the elected official is denying those people representation. If he wants to hold a non-republican only event for equal representation, then that's a really dumb way to do it, but at least is closer to acceptable.

It's the "taxation without representation" thing, not the "blocking a demographic from their private event" thing.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, that's not how it works.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 day ago (2 children)

These fucking idiots willfully forget they are supposed to represent everyone in their districts. I hope everyone else in his district makes a picket line to keep all the traitors out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

The people who bought them don't appreciate them working for other people.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there would be a larger crowd outside than those allowed in.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

I'm picturing a moat of people, like 30-60 feet deep around the event. A couple orders of magnitude more people outside than inside. And thinking that might give an impression.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago

Ah, so a bunch of assholes smelling their own farts. Got it.