this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
556 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

66922 readers
5077 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House officials said the installation was an effort to increase internet availability at the complex. They said that some areas of the property could not get cell service and that the existing Wi-Fi infrastructure was overtaxed.

(page 2) 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

It would be a shame if some foreign actor could monitor Starlink internal networks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anyone see the Johnny English with the American billionaire cyber-terrorist Jason Volta as the main antagonist?

That's how I see news coming from Washington developing on a daily basis.

We need you Rowan Atkinson.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The existing Wi-Fi infrastructure was “overtaxed” so they just threw up satellite instead of , I don’t know, improving the Wi-Fi infrastructure? There’s perfectly fine WiFi at sprawling work and college campuses, and stadiums that seat tens of thousands of people. What a joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The only security this White House cares about is its own power and hiding (for the time being) its complete disregard for anything else.

[–] [email protected] 173 points 1 day ago (6 children)

In any healthy democracy, this would have been seen as a scandal exposing signs of corruption and would have likely resulted in the dissolution of the government and early election.

But the US is not a healthy democracy.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The corruption is clear, obvious, and blatant. Everyone knows about it, but there’s not a whole lot they can do. A good chunk of our citizens picked it on purpose.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

it's necessary so the Saudis can livestream all the blowjobs and asslickling happening in the oval office.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

FFS, can we deal with these fucking traitors already?!?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

President Musk making it feel more like home.
Add 13 children of ambiguous parentage he can ignore, and snug as a bug!

[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If you live in the DC area, absolutely do NOT sign up for this service.

100% chance that the government, as well as musks companies would be monitoring you directly 24/7.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Run everything through a VPN tunnel instead?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Don't support fascists. Even if you have a VPN.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well now the Chinese and Russians just need to get a way into Shartlink and they can also monitor you and your government.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they're already in, guaranteed

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, we fired the cyber security people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Salt Typhoon is still ongoing, as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wholeheartedly agree.

However, it's hard to say that AT&T, Comcast, Cox and the like aren't all doing the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

The way I see stuff like this is that you don't have to hand over your information on a silver platter directly to the agents.

Like when a trainload of east germans was allowed to migrate to the west through a separate country, they just had to hand their passports to the Stasi before being let go.

When the Stasi agents came to the train to collect the passports the east germans just threw them on the floor instead of handing them over, that is kinda how this should be viewed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm gonna teach you a lesson on improv: "yes, and".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"some areas of the property could not get cell service"

Like the bunkers? Like hell did the white house not have cell service.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Plenty of federal facilities have garbage reception. I think it's probably due to the bureaucracy involved in telecoms installing their hardware on sensitive property. The White House in particular probably has lots of thick walls/armor attenuating signals, too.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can believe areas of the White House have no cell service, on purpose. Remember when they found those fake cell towers around DC?

https://www.wired.com/story/dcs-stingray-dhs-surveillance/

I bet at some point they installed some cell phone jammers specifically to limit the amount of foreign spying that could be done by fake towers, and they simply "forgot" to tell the incoming Trump administration....

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

probably more likely they fired the original IT team and replaced them with Muskite interns

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›