if you own more than 1000 in 30 years treasuries, you get a wall as a lazy bum. but for real, the goal of socialism is to work less, have control over what you work for and how much you work. As we don't have full automation, edge case (able bodied, physically, mentally, socially) and not looking for work person shouldn't automatically be considered a person we should fight for (i for one think those people are actually very rare, cause it's boring as shit). Somebody grown and milled the flour you eat, you have to give something back (or you can do coop living, but have fun explaining there why you don't want to do anything). Or you can live in log cabin with a gun, but that's another thing, and not something those people would call lazy.
Now, there is a lot of work society doesn't deem profitable and thus not compensating (be it elder care or young people care, home work etc), so again you can construct argument around that person not being "lazy" actually.
The danger of this argument, appearing reasonable on its face, is constructing labyrinth of means testing which hurts more people than it helps.
But when people imagine this type of person, they are doing some sort of reagan "black people in cadillac", and likely being racist as well.
so choose your thingy as counterargument (means testing hurts more than helps, finance bros are more dangerous, caring for kids is work actually, "how did that work out for y'all since 80s, crackers?" - don't work on people on the internet, cause it's upper quintiles, "natural unemployment rate" is a thing they decided to accept)
also poster nr2 probably pays more to his owners than taxes, the little crab in the bucket.
microvacation is when you visit restroom, but don't clock out