lvxferre

joined 7 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

/me grabs soapbox

I'll focus on people. I avoid people who consistent or egregiously:

  • are assumptive, gullible, or fallacious.
  • expect me to be assumptive, gullible, or fallacious.
  • are eager to violate the others' autonomy; for example, the "I never take a «no» for an answer" ones.
  • defend their actions based on intentions (instead of responsibility, outcome, or info at hand).
  • expect me to apologise for things they know I have no blame for.
  • claim that fighting back makes me as bad as my enemies, i.e. who expect me to become a punching bag.

Note: "consistent or egregiously" is key here. A brainfart or a derp is fine; but some things happen too often, or are too strong, to be considered simply brainfarts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

I didn't know that I needed to know about Jevons' paradox. Such a simple but brilliant reasoning.

You'll get less pollution and crash deaths if, instead of trying to improve cars, society improved transportation methods that compete with cars: walking, biking, public transport, so goes on. They either don't show those issues, or show them in a meaningfully lower level.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Instantly subscribed to that comm.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago

I'm aware of the site:example.com google feature. And, while useful for users who already know about Lemmy, it doesn't help to recruit new users, and that's a main point of the OP.

About centralisation: that "yet" is key. Putting all your eggs in the same basket is not a bad thing... until someone drops the basket, you know?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

I've seen your post. Ouch - you stumbled upon some nasty circlejerking there. On multiple levels.

Plenty people here expect you to treat their "vision" as above everything else. Including your agency ("free will"), issues that you might want to solve, etc. That makes them unable to tell the difference between "criticising Apple" (a fair thing to do) versus "treating someone who bought an iPhone as an emissary of Satan" (what they're doing against you).

To make things worse plenty muppets there are putting words in your mouth, regarding Samsung vs. Apple.

If it's any consolation, it isn't just Lemmy. The whole internet of the 20s feels like this nowadays.

TL;DR: I know that feel, bro.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

The "instances hosting communities" structure alleviates albeit not solves this problem; communities about related topics end in the same instances, that you can block.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I mostly agree with the OP, it would be great if Lemmy had more sources of newbies than just "pissed off redditors". (I have further reasons for that, but they don't matter here.) As such I'll focus on specific tidbits here and there.

The content is indexable (by Google), but your point stands as it sucks. It's hard to reliably find Lemmy content by it.

Do you - or anyone here - have a good idea on how to solve that? Someone suggested a Lemmy-based engine; it's tempting but it wouldn't help if the person doesn't know about Lemmy already.

Reddit is not something you discover from word-of-mouth or join from peer pressure

It used to be like this. "Stumbling" upon the site was only a thing later, as it had already enough content to become a source of info.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

Even taking only English speakers into account, it isn't a bad name. It's a simple word, it sounds like "let me" (good association - unlike... GIMP), at most it might evoke you Lemmings.

And once considering other languages it's actually better than plenty brands out there, including Reddit, Facebook or Twitter. By sticking to CV syllables there's less room to butcher it into unrecognisability.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago

Absurdity is like seeing your cat go "mrwn! mrwn!" at the passing plane, then suddenly flying and catching it. Then cruelty is what your cat does with the passengers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

Reddit Gold is a great example IMO.

If Reddit's goal was to serve users, instead of profit, it might've still implemented Reddit Gold. A site doesn't run for free, and having another source of income could help to serve users better.

However then the nature of Reddit Gold would be completely different:

  • There wouldn't be a "gilded" sorting, as it enables astroturfers to exchange money for visibility.
  • There wouldn't be microtransaction mechanics associated with it, such as packs of "X+Y coins" associated with broken values in real money (so you need to pull out a calculator to know which one has the cheapest price).
  • Even if platinum might've appeared, silver wouldn't. Because the userbase was already joking about a "Reddit silver" award; so creating a Reddit silver was basically "nice meme you have there, it's now my source of profit, sucker".
  • It wouldn't change every five minutes as they were trying to find the best way to capitalise on it. "Gold! Awards! Coins! Back to gold! Rewards system!"
  • They would've asked the users on potential ways to finance the site without contradicting its values.
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

To be fair I've had a few bad experiences with Hexbears, but I think that most of them boil down to "unfunny guy interacting with unserious kids". But since I'm often lurking there in my political account, I feel like my opinion about them is a bit less ungrounded than this whole "Hexbear bad! EDIT WOW THANKS FOR THE GOLD KIND STRANGER!" echo chamber.

(I also have a few bones to pick with .ml [the people in charge, not the whole instance], but they don't apply to LG or HB, it's a matter of transparency.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

Reddit could've become a non-profit for users, financed by them. So the outcome was avoidable, at least years and years in the past.

But for that Pigboy and kn0thing would need to give up the pretension of drinking champagne in an IPO. kn0thing gave up too late; Pigboy never did.

A good "dividing line" where the outcome became fixed was the introduction of Reddit Gold.

 

[Idea] If you don't want to see huge flags taking space over actual drawings in the Canvas, pick the biggest flag that you can find to deface.

As long as a lot of people are doing that, the ones templating larger flags will be forced to reduce their layouts and give more room for actual drawings.


[Reasoning] When it comes to country flags, I think that the immense majority of the users can be split into four groups:

  1. The ones who don't want to see country flags at all.
  2. The ones who are OK with smaller flags, but don't want to see larger ones.
  3. The ones who want to see a specific large flag taking a huge chunk of space.
  4. The ones who want to see the whole canvas burning, like the void.

I'm myself firmly rooted into #1, but this idea is a compromise between #1, #2 and #4.

Typically #3 uses numbers (and/or bots) to seize a huge chunk of the canvas to their flags. Well, let's use numbers against it then. As long as #1, #2 and #4 are trying to wreck the same flag, we win.


[inb4]

But what about identity flags?

Not a problem. They're typically bands instead of thick squares, and people drawing them are fairly accommodating.

But what about [insert another thing]

Even if [thing] is a problem, it's probably minor in comparison with huge country flags.

What should be the template?

None. We don't need one, as long as everyone is working against the same large flag.

Just draw something of your choice over the flag, preferably over its iconic features.

But I'm not creative enough for that!

No matter how shitty your drawing is, it's probably still way more original than a country flag. So don't feel discouraged.

That said, you can always help someone else with their drawing. Or plop in some text. Or just void.

Why are you posting this now, you bloody Slowpoke?

I wish that I thought about this before Canvas 2024. But better later than never. (And better early by a year for Canvas 2025.)


EDIT: addressing on general grounds some whining from group #3 (the ones who want to see a specific large flag taking a huge chunk of the canvas space).

You do realise that this sort of "war against the largest flag" should benefit even you, as long as the biggest flag is not the one you're working with, right? Even for you, this makes the canvas a more even level field. Let us not forget that you love to cover other flags with your own.

 
18
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

This recipe is great to repurpose lunch leftovers for dinner. It's also relatively mess-free. Loosely based on egg-fried rice.

Amounts listed for two servings, but they're eyeballed so use your judgment.

Ingredients:

  • Cooked leftover rice. 200~300g (cooked) is probably good enough. It's fine to use pilaf, just make sure that the rice is cold, a bit dry, and that the grains are easy to separate.
  • Two eggs. Cracked into a small bowl and whisked with salt, pepper, and MSG. Or the seasoning of your choice.
  • Veg oil. For browning.
  • Water. Or broth if you want, it's just a bit.
  • [OPTIONAL] Meats. Leftover beef, pork, or chicken work well. Supplement it with ham, firmer sausages, and/or bacon; 1/2 cup should be enough for two. Dice them small.
  • [OPTIONAL] Vegs. I'd add at least half raw onion; but feel free to use leftover cooked cabbages, peas, bell peppers, etc. Or even raw ones. Also diced small.
  • [OPTIONAL] Chives. Mostly as a finishing touch. Sliced thinly.

Preparation:

  1. Add a spoonful of veg oil to a wok or similar. Let it heat a bit.
  2. If using raw meats: add them to the wok, and let them brown on high fire, stirring constantly. Else, skip this step.
  3. If using raw vegs: add them to the wok, and let them it cook on mid-low fire. Else, skip this step.
  4. Add the already cooked ingredients (rice, meats, vegs). Medium fire, stirring gentle but constantly; you want to heat them up, not to cook them further. Adjust seasoning if desired.
  5. Spread the whisked egg over your heated rice mix, while stirring and folding the rice frenetically. You want the egg to coat the rice grains, but they should be still separated when done. If some whisked egg is sticking to the wok and/or the rice is too dry, drip some water/broth and scrap the bottom of the wok; just don't overdo it (you don't want soggy rice). Anyway, when the egg is cooked this step is done, it'll give the rice grains a nice yellow colour and lots of flavour.
  6. If using chives, add them after your turned off the fire (they get sad if cooked). Enjoy your meal.

I was going to share a picture of the final result, but I may or may not have eaten it before thinking about sharing the recipe. Sorry. :#

 

I got a weird problem involving both of my cats (Siegfrieda, to the left; Kika, to the right).

Kika is rather particular about having her own litterbox(es), and refuses to use a litterbox shared by another cat. Frieda on the other hand is adept to the "if I fits, I sits, I shits" philosophy, and is totally OK sharing litterboxes.

That creates a problem: no matter if properly and regularly cleaned, the only one using litterboxes here is Frieda. We had, like, five of them at once; and Kika would still rather do her business on the patio.

How do I either teach Kika "it's fine to share a litterbox", or teach Siegfrieda "that's Kika's litterbox, leave it alone"?

 

Context: my mum got some keikis of this orchid from a neighbour. She managed to grow them into a full plant, it even flowered (as per pic), but she has no idea on which species of orchid it is.

I am not sure if it's a native species here (I'm in the subtropical parts of South America), but it seems to be growing just fine indoors in a Cfb climate.

Disregard the vase saying "phal azul" (blue phal), it used to belong to another orchid; it doesn't seem to be a Phalaenopsis.

If necessary I can provide further pics, but note that it has lost the flowers already.

Any idea?


EDIT: thanks to @[email protected]'s comment, we could find it - it's a Miltoniopsis. Likely from Colombia or Ecuador, not from my area.

 

I feel slightly offended. Because it's true.

(Alt text: "Do you feel like the answer depends on whether you're currently in the hole, versus when you refer to the events later after you get out? Assuming you get out.")

 

Link to the community: [email protected]

Feel free to join and talk about your favourite series. The rules are rather simple, and they're there to ensure smooth discussion.

 

Source.

Alt-text: «God was like, "Let there be light," and there was light.»

 
 

Links to the community:

The community is open for everyone regardless of previous knowledge on the field. Feel free to ask or share stuff about languages and dialects, how they work (grammar, phonology, etc.), where they're from, how people use them, or more general stuff about human linguistic communication.

And the rules are fairly simple. They boil down to 1) stay on-topic, 2) source it when reasonable, 3) avoid pseudoscience.

Have fun!

view more: next ›