Gsus4

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't think anybody planned beyond that, by everyone's reactions. But it looks as if people read too much Fukuyama uncritically and not enough Huntington.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

Unless it is used to pretend that it is a real video and circulated for denigration or blackmail, it is very much not at all like assault. And also, deepfakes do not have the special features hidden under your clothes, so it is possible to debunk those if you really have to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Or pasting someone's photo over porn...in their minds...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Exactly, Taiwan made sure it was worth defending, but I fear that this will lose value over time. Besides you never know what stupid shit is going to come out of tramp's brain the day anything escalates.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

yeah...really puts the maga view of Europe of "pathetic freeloaders" into context...I just don't believe that leaving the US would make Europe safe. On the contrary. I actually fear a grand bargain to finally destroy liberal democracy between idiot dealmaker trump and rising power Xi. Their interests are aligned in this respect: as long as it exists anywhere, liberal democracy is a threat to their political projects.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well, things were slightly better before COVID, after that, the EU decided to derisk, because trust in China actually decreased across the board. In other words, the US is not as untrustworthy as China...yet.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (5 children)

"Take on" is doing the heavy lifting in that whole video. It means dealing with all sorts of hybrid warfare on the part of China, like cyberattacks or funding Orban and far-right parties or taking on the cheap electric vehicles. It does not mean going to war with China. Even if you look at NATO's documents, it is referred to as a long-term challenge, not a direct threat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The EU can't abandon the US first, more likely that the US would abandon the EU... damn...this is like couples' therapy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Yeah, nobody in the EU is going to war with China, but its tech dominance (as the US's) poses a challenge to how the countries organize themselves. You confuse The EU with the west, but if the US abandoned NATO, would China abandon russia? I don't think so. So China's backstop of russia is a direct threat to the EU, whereas the EU is not direct threat to China without going through the US.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There are wealthy people in China too (and a disgusting cult of wealth to go with it to make any communist nauseous or any oligarch envious) and they're obedient little piggies, just like those idiots at tramp's inauguration

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

By humiliating and pushing out the pacifists, you ensure that there will be war. That's it. The US is doing it, russia is doing it, China apparently also wants to do it, why not.

 
 

It is a 2023 1h compilation of parts of different episodes of the documental series Blue World II (2017)

 
 

A provision "hidden" in the sweeping budget bill that passed the U.S. House on Thursday seeks to limit the ability of courts—including the U.S. Supreme Court—from enforcing their orders.

"No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued," the provision in the bill, which is more than 1,000 pages long, says.

The provision "would make most existing injunctions—in antitrust cases, police reform cases, school desegregation cases, and others—unenforceable," Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, told Newsweek. "It serves no purpose but to weaken the power of the federal courts."

 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/18936370

http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/calculating-2

Alt textImagine doing internal fertilization without telepathy. I mean holy shit!

Bonus panelBonus panel

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29566496

https://archive.is/wGp2F

So slavery as indentured servitude is the American future. Way to "new model" the old model.

view more: ‹ prev next ›