Visitors*
Or is there a single visitor who's just half of a human?
this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
157 points (98.8% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
6788 readers
437 users here now
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
Banner made by u/Fertility18
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
build all your cities' skylines to look like stacks of conference chairs to confuse your enemies
What is on the underside of it, and why is it on that goofy angle?
It's a boy
Sorry he's a little excited
It does look a bit like a red rocket, doesn't it?
It's weird. Ive been to more than a few aircraft museums, but I've never seen an A-10. I've seen two SR-71s.
Ive been to more than a few aircraft museums
It's OK to be honest here, this is a safe space. You can admit to going to the aircraft museum an unhealthy amount of times and studying the locations of cameras so you can make out with all those sexy planes in peace.
Where did you see the SR-71? I have seen the A12 Blackbird, but that was years back on the Intrepid in NY
The Boeing Museum of Flight in Seattle has one. I was just there ~~petting~~ viewing their Blackbird a few months ago.
That's cool. I'll have to remember that if I'm ever in Seattle
We need an A-11 already. Make it stealthy and give it a giant railgun or something. Give the world what it wants: even bigger flying gun.
Too many blue on blue incidents for any squadron commander to OK a gunpass in an A-10 ever again.
It's a bombtruck for Day 3 operations against asymmetric foes.
Lol ok here you go:
Bohemia Interactive basically imagined up what you're asking for about a decade ago, and at least in my circles, everyone thought this was the stupidest looking thing ever.
Not stealthy though, no railgun, it's just an A-10 with a Japanese body kit installed 0/10
idk I think the A-10 is more of a trad-CAS influencer than a genuine warplane suited for near-peer conflicts in contested airspace at this point, it is weird and I am pretty sure it isn't a good idea but the algorithm likes the brand so shrugs I think the successor to the A-10 needs to lean into the whole influencer lifestyle thing from the get go.
Make it look cool and design an advanced network of escort drones that constantly orbit the aircraft ready to launch into action at the first sign of content and beginning taking selfies of the aircraft.
Maximum impact will be achieved from the pilot having access to a social media avionics suit complete with a state-of-the-art "A-10 Trad-CAS" reply-by-wire guy Automated Post Authoring System customized from software developed by the CIA to help topple vulnerable democratic governments in central and south america.
This shit is why I stick around noncredibledefense.
To be fair I'm not actually sure how incorrect that actually could be.
Plenty of guys over there agree that the Hog is a modern Stuka. They're both impressive, have intimidating reputations, make a scary sound, and too vulnerable to operate without air supremacy.
And the Air Force agrees. In Desert Storm, the A10s had to hunt SCUDS in the desert because they were getting murdered by Iraqi anti-air.
I mean, I could see the A-10 being useful in a near-peer conflict unmanned piloted by a remote drone operator in a swarm of covering/scout drones with purposefully worse radar/heat signatures.
The remote drone operator could fly the A-10 employing a nuanced strategy of "Fuck As Much Shit Up As I Can In The Shortest Amount Of Time Until I Get Blown Up" (not gonna write that acronym out, but trust me it is in plenty of DOD whitepapers) military strategy developed by Henry Kissinger during his time at the Rand Corporation. The idea wouldn't really be to take too many airframes home, but if it is WW3 than I mean who is worrying about retirement!
FAMSUAICITSAOTUIGBU
I'm fairly certain that if A10s were deployed in Ukraine, Zelenskyy would be in Moscow by now.
.... I feel like you could take out a an A-10 with just shoulder launched AA missiles? I would much prefer to be a helicopter in a high threat environment than an A-10 since you can more easily hide behind terrain as cover. I mean really, the difference between life an death is going to be the couple degrees of cover given by a ridge you get from hovering as absolutely close as you can to the ground as you get ready to launch a TOW... you don't want to be an airplane in that kind of environment unless you are really fucking fast.
Nonsense, the Hog will take any missile like a champ and keep flying. Have faith!
Warthog will take a stinger, half the tail falls off and it banks hard to the left. As it comes around, you swear the shark's mouth nose art grins a little.
In Arma 3 they have the A-164 Wipeout which is either the coolest thing ever or a cursed monstrosity depending on who you ask