Bullshit.
This is all hoked-up drama to distract the masses while they push us into working poverty.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Bullshit.
This is all hoked-up drama to distract the masses while they push us into working poverty.
Agent Krasnov and whatever KGB names Elon and his father have been given would agree.
c'mon do it, you jilted sycophantic cuck. you were born to engage in political corruption, get burned by people better at it than you, than lash out at them in a tantrum fueled by your delusions of having conflicted morals. just do it
#DO THE MANCHILD, HUSK
Padme: you are going to release the video footage, right?
As a Republican this Leaves me ANGRY because I THOUGHT the CLINTONS were on that List but if Trump, who was Epstein's Best Friend, says there is No List then that means the CLINTONS never Raped kids either!
Bro he's good friends with the Clinton's too
Honestly I think it's kind of funny the administration is trying to bury this, because there is already very public information on Trump being a rapist and making creepy remarks towards young girls.
If it releases with him on it his supporters would absolutely do the mental gymnastics required to use it as proof the liberal elite are an evil cabal, while also insisting that dear leader is blameless.
an evil cabal
There’s that word, which Marjorie TG mispronounced as cable in a Qanon promotional video years ago. Fucking dumbass.
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/trump-epstein-2016-complaint.pdf
This court filing is horrific and names both trump and Epstein as defendants. The victim withdrew after the deposition, if I’m remembering correctly.
They would do mental gymnastics to wave off dear leader fucking little girls, yes.
Would they forgive him for fucking little boys though?
Is he a Catholic priest? Survey sayyys...
Trump infiltrated the pedo ring to bring it down, naturally.
I know the /s is there (mentally) but the idea that someone is mad that kids weren't raped is abhorrent.
The title of that article should be "Elon Musk Gets His Name In Print Again"
Because there's nothing there, really. I'm reading an old book ("old" meaning twenty years which is not old but- ) it has used Newsweek as a source of truth several times. Because there was a time it was considered to be so.
It is not now. Whoever owns it is playing a bad game of chicken with journalism.
If they report on the old things: "this isn't new news! Stupid media"
If they don't, "ugh 24 hour news cycle, they report on it once then forget about it. Stupid media."
I'm giving this one a pass if it keeps the files in the limelight and/or pisses off Trump.
Yes it serves our purposes, sure. It has nothing to do with whether or not the news is "old" or "new". At least not for me. For the mods of c/news perhaps.
You can pick one of the 70 sources from this list, then: https://ground.news/article/jeffrey-epstein-had-no-client-list
Oh the list exists, of course. I'm not saying they're making up things necessarily - just that they're making "news articles" out of tweets and other low-effort so-called-journalism which wasn't really the case a long time ago.
No need to single out Newsweek, then, as basically all publications opted for this sort of cheap content to inflate their pages...
Newsweek, given it's history and the crass purchasing of the branding is especially egregious.
business insider, for example, can do what it wants and yeah it's just regular terrible.