Locking thread. Comments are getting off-topic.
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
148 points (100.0% liked)
Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'
1451 readers
11 users here now
Rules:
-
News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.
-
Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.
-
Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.
-
Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.
Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.
Communities We Like:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What the dairy fuckin' state is going on here?
Let me check for ya, Hey Larry, what in the dairy fuckin' state is going on here?
According to the owner, the chickens were there (and I quote) "For eat", which I just love. Considering the drugs, the drug sales ledger and the ammo - probably it's cock fighting, yeah?
I don’t get how there is outrage about chickens fighting when basically all bars serve dead chickens?
Yeah I think that's a fair point. I feel like meat eaters often use the utility of the carcass to justify the death - "They use every part of the chicken, nothing goes to waste".
A lot of people do seem to think eating it is a more justifiable death then gambling on the life then disposing of the carcass, but maybe a beakless immobile battery hen would disagree.
The “nothing goes to waste” argument just ignores the victims life though. They did not want to die.
Also seems like a pretty easy solution then to just eat the killed bird and bing bang bosh: cock fighting is morally justified.
Solution: Get some really, really depressed chickens
Yeah, it's such a prevalent attitude but I agree it doesn't hold water.
I suspect being unaware of the amount of unnecessary suffering in meat production probably plays a role too.
i Look at it this way. All life gets eaten by something eventually, so consumption itself can't be immoral.
Causing suffering to the living certainly can be.
All life gets eaten by something eventually, so consumption itself can’t be immoral.
Yeah we are not talking about the consumption part, we are talking about the killing part. If you find a dead squirrel or deer, it’s not immoral to eat them. Ending someone’s life against their will is though, it doesn’t really matter what your intentions are.
there is no proof nonhuman animals understand personal mortality, so we can't say they have a will to live
A toddler or a mentally disabled person can’t understand morality. I wouldn’t personally kill and eat those.
comparing mental disabled people to children is insulting. comparing them to animals is fucking gross.
I did not compare them, they just have the trait you claimed was the justification for killing animals. Humans are animals and a subset of us have the trait you described. I just pointed out that is not a good justification.
I didn't try to justify it at all. I said that you are making unfounded claims.
I think you misread mortality as morality
Ah, you are right, I did. I believe the same can be said about mortality though.
you could look for literature to support your claim.
What if someone ran over that dead deer. They killed it. Is it okay to eat a dead thing if someone else kills it?
Intention is what you’re looking for. It is immoral to intentionally kill someone.
I appreciate you sharing your moral perspective with me.
Do you have any fringe cases where intentionally killing someone is morally justified?
There is probably cases where you could try to morally justify anything (like in a survival situation I guess?) but I personally would try to abstain from killing under any circumstance.
The morals around eating animals are luckily not that vague. You do not need animal products to live (say all major dietician organizations) so the only reasons people are eating meat is out of habit or for taste. And pleasure does not justify killing a sentient being.
you don't know what anyone needs. you're not their doctor or dietician.
All major dietician organizations agree that living on a plant based diet can be healthy during any stage of life including infancy, pregnancy, etc
the AND no longer has that position. the Australian association based their findings on the AND position paper. and there are other associations which specifically do not recommend it during pregnancy and infancy. even the now-expired AND position paper was mostly about the possible dangers.
Source? Australian dietician organization has a specific guide for veg/vegans here: https://member.dietitiansaustralia.org.au/Common/Uploaded%20files/DAA/Resource_Library/2020/VF_AGHE_for_Vegetarians_updated.pdf
it says it's based on the now-expired AND position
Well who knows, maybe they were part of an elaborate airline miles fraud scheme like in that one Always Sunny episode
You can't have any fun anymore!
When i read the headline i thought it was about the Wisconsin State Bar.
Well that wouldn't be news now would it.
"Wisconsins hot new bar has everything! Bowls of cocaine! Shots fired! And live chickens in the basement!"