this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
530 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19273 readers
1910 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (15 children)

They won't be able to implement half of it just due to the bureaucracy of the system fighting against any kind of big change. The part they do manage to ram through will be damaging enough, though.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (5 children)

They have control of all three branches of government. No checks. No balances.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

shit bouta be wild

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Our only hope is if Project 2025 ends up not being implemented in full because of its one fatal flaw: Donald Trump didn't think of it first. He might ignore parts of it out of spite, just to make sure the Heritage Foundation understands that it is not President.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, I also suspect he may be dumb enough to do something like dissolve the IRS. Which would more or less destroy all forms of federal governmental power both soft and hard. Its something rhe sovcits have wanted for decades and I would not be surprised in the least if he got convinced by one.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 125 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Meanwhile the newspapers: "FACT CHECK: It is incorrect to associate project 2025 with the Trump campaign" 🙄

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Besides fox News and the like, who said that?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nope. Not what you're saying it is. They call out its origin even.

The plan was written up by many of his former aides and allies,

They also briefly mention what he claims. That is in no way corroborating it. They are simply trying to avoid seeming biased. The other time "2025" appears in that page, it's a quote from Harris about how dangerous it is.

This is normal and decent journalism.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those are some questionable sources.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

MAGAS are incapable of associating anything bad with their dear leader. Hold them accountable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›