Dennis is explaining that having sex with a woman is easier on a boat because of "the implications". Mac asks him if he means the implication of rape, and Dennis unconvincing argues against that characterization.
Further context: Dennis is a sociopath, and generally a bad person.
I suspect that this was something of a test case, with the regulator flexing their censorship muscle, and I'm glad it didn't work out.
This was a POV stabbing video that people spread around to glorify violence. It's in the same category as beheading videos.
America may have decided that child porn is the only media exception to free speech, but other more sane countries draw the line a little bit more broadly to include all forms of extremely violent crime filmed to be glorified, including things like murder, attempted murder, torture, and the rape of adults.
If you want to operate a business in places like Australia or New Zealand, you cannot be distributing violent gore videos within their borders.
I hope they revisit this as X users are pretty routinely celebrating things like the Christchurch shooting and other violent extremist incidents. Sometimes censorship makes sense, and when people are antagonistically spreading videos of people being maimed and killed, the "free speech" argument absolutely doesn't fucking cut it.
Please actually watch the show before you try Sunny memeing...
Interesting dog whistle...
Not well versed in bird law, eh?
Yeah, it works, but it's really quite clunky...
Tl;Dr: Sharing Nude scenes out-of-context are considered a form of involuntary pornography in Denmark (portraying artistic nudity as pornography) and this man was arrested for compiling and sharing nude scenes of Danish actors from Danish films and sharing them while inside Denmark...
This has nothing to do with film studio profits or piracy, this is a man who ran afowl of his home country's laws about pornography.
And to be fair, a woman appearing nude in a film doesn't mean that sexualizing the shit out of her publicly isn't scummy fucked up behavior. I think I understand the law here.
Amazingly, this is an actual photograph. It was published by Pearson. Also, there's a back:
Oh boo hoo, Jack Black recognized the risk posed to his crew and his fans after is bandmate called for political violence on stage. Fuck him, right?
Y'all act like he endorsed Trump or something... He recognized that in the wake of an assassination attempt on a former president, his bandmate's endorsement of violence and calling for another assassination attempt could put them and their crowded concerts in the cross hairs of violent right-wing lunatics.
At worst his cancellation of the tour was an overreaction, but he's not wrong. His bandmate fucked up by saying something violent and stupid intended to enrage an large and unstable faction of American fascists.
And a horrendous use of resources.
This was a stable diffusion model trained on hundreds of thousands of images. This is actually a pretty small training set and a pretty lightweight model to train.
Custom / novel SD models are created and shared by hobbyists all the time. It's something you can do with a Gaming PC, so it's not any worse a resource waste than gaming.
I'm betting Google didn't throw a lot of money at the "get it to play Doom" guys anyway.
Who is that woman on the right? Are we supposed to recognize her or something?
He looks like his parents.
More unserious memes plz.
Not really the same thing. "Lifetime warranties" have for decades now referred to the lifetime of the product as stated in the warranty, not the lifetime of the consumer.
Any consumer still interpreting "Lifetime" in this context to mean "the rest of my life", is just being stupid. Read the terms of the agreement before assuming you know what it protects...
"Perpetual licensing" on the other hand, is pretty clearly defined as "pay once, use forever", so to sunset that agreement and start charging subscription fees is fraudulent.