We're all tired of all ads.
A friend proposed that a big button should appear immediately after you vote and pressing it would stop all political ads.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
We're all tired of all ads.
A friend proposed that a big button should appear immediately after you vote and pressing it would stop all political ads.
Its literally the only 45 ads i see during football, the only effect it has is making me want to vote for Kamala.
Yeah, I saw one yesterday for the first time during football because I typically avoid all the classic sources of commercials, and it was just two dude bros who looked like they were making a podcast sitting around saying "Yo, I don't want all my tax money being used to give prisoners sex change operations". And I thought, "who on earth would this possible convince to vote for Trump who wasn't already absolutely going to?"
It's funny that the people who preach freedom and having their rights are the very people who want to take our rights. Actually it's not that funny.
Because, from them, the law exists as a means to punish people you don't like.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
I like that, who said it?
From that article:
This quotation is often incorrectly attributed to Francis M. Wilhoit:
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.[10]
However, it was actually a 2018 blog response by 59-year-old Ohio composer Frank Wilhoit, years after Francis Wilhoit's death.[11]
I've definitely heard this quote prior to 2018. I won't pretend to know who said it first but there's no way it originated then.
From that page:
This quotation is often incorrectly attributed to Francis M. Wilhoit:
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.[10]
However, it was actually a 2018 blog response by 59-year-old Ohio composer Frank Wilhoit, years after Francis Wilhoit's death.[11]
Thank you
Stop worrying about what's in other people's pants. Especially kids pants.
Fucking Weirdos.
Just let the doctors do their job helping people be happy with themselves.
I worry what is in kids pants. Way too often it's the hand of someone in a position of trust.