You should really not use double quotation marks when you are paraphrasing, a lot of people will confuse this for a direct quote
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
169 points (90.8% liked)
politics
18870 readers
3822 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Better drop out then, eh?
Final solution, eh? Sounds familiar.
Is anybody saying that the answer is more guns? No? Then why is that the answer after every school shooting?
Why didn't Trump have a gun??? Wouldn't he be safer??
So they've had two Republican voters try and assassinate the Republican nominee for president while they've be spouting of about political violence as the answer but yeah, it's the Democrats fault.
I’m not a fan of this point of view because I don’t think we fully understand the motives of either shooter. The first’s motive seems ambiguous, at best. It’s too soon to know for the second. You could technically call them Republican voters based on social media history, but I heard the second shooter became disillusioned with Trump sometime after 2016, which is why I feel like comments like this are leading us into a direction we aren’t yet ready to go. Either way, people want to pin these events on a political motive and in the end they may be no more politically motivated than some of the clearly apolitical school shootings.
I blame Trump for his own outcome though. To shit on victims of gun crime and to shit on everybody in general in such a public space, for the President of the United States of all things, is not going to end well for anybody.
Whatever they were, they weren't leftist radicals or even Democratic superfans taking political inspiration from establishment candidates like Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. That's the important part. We don't know what their actual motive was, but there's no indication Democrats using disapproving language had any realistic impact.
We can keep an open mind without accepting their implausible narrative.
He's a narcissist, he's literally incapable of accepting blame.
Communist lol. Fuck off and die (in a supermax).
Quick could you put on this fantastic the best of the best orange.... I mean burnt sunset coverall for a photo opportunity.
hilarious. there is only one side where the politicians and the media talk violence and its not the left. yeah violence is talked about by individuals but not ones holding office or part of non extreme left leaning media.
Which is why both would-be assassins were conservatives.
meh. they both seemed so back and forth they are nutters but there is one politician whose rallies seemed filled with the type.
Let's hope so.
Just today I have read about Republicans calling immigrants "animals" and "illegal human locusts," and now Trump is calling for a "final solution" to the "Immigrant Problem." This is straight up Nazism, right out in the open, and we'll all suffer if they are given power.
To be clear, those were my words paraphrasing his post. Read his words. They exude Hitler energy in that post, and encourage behavior in others like you describe.
Edit to add the post in question:
there's no way trump actually wrote this.
What the hell is a debate supposed to be if not partisan? It's about the parties running is it not?
Well, that's a little bit of a relief. But only a little bit.
Simple, he should just buy some guns for protection!
Thoughts and prayers if he gets killed.
That's how it works, right? European here.
I'm having throughts and prayers already.
We should have universal background checks for firearms and a ban on assault weapons like what was used to attack former President Trump!
Oops, I cribbed that from Harris and Walz's Evil Communist Leftist Campaign.
Donnie just a few hours earlier: 
So far it's just Republicans that are shooting at him
Well, that's a new one. I wasn't expecting the leopard to be resentful about all the face eating.
"THE WORLD IS LAUGHING AT US AS FOOLS..."
My favorite part is when he gets something so insanely wrong that it spins full circle and he gets it right anyway, just for completely the wrong reason.
Guy who spews hatred. blames others for blowback. Sounds narcissistic doesn't it.
In 2015 the night he announced 2 of his supporters beat a homeless man with a pipe and urinated on him. They turned to the camera and said "trump 2016". He took days and more than one interview to condemn them. This was before he realized he could lie and misdirect these thing.
final solution
Still rocking that Nazi fash, Donnie?
OP said they were paraphrasing his comments, not quoting him; the word "final" doesn't appear in the linked article at all.
I had to double check because it caught my eye, too.
To be clear, "final solution" is a phrase OP added for effect, not literally quoted from Trump in this instance.
Wow, blatent Nazi reference: https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/final-solution-overview
Well of course it's going to get worse. One of the parties will not allow even moderate, reasonable gun legislation. Every former Trump supporting loon with a grudge can get a gun with no problem.