this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
-5 points (44.9% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6294 readers
26 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I think most people who use it are just scared from the uneducated downvotes/ backlash and I think it just ruins the sarcasm.

I started to avoid using it on other social media as it seems kind of dumb.

My opinion for it on Lemmy is mostly the same but it might work better here if Lemmy had a sarcasm tag instead(the same way NSFW tag work)of /s to signal the sarcasm instead.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Or maybe gen pop should get better at reading comprehension and learning to ask clarifying question if they are unable to understand content and context for whatever reason.

That's how discussions work.

OR we can just SPAZZZ RHEEEEE, DOWN VOTE BIGOT SOYBOY!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So instead of a /s showing sarcasm we’d have a tag showing sarcasm. What exactly is the difference?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Instead of typing /NSFW, Why do we tag NSFW?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Unless you want the ability to utilize the tags. For example : never show sarcasm posts/comments

Or

Only show sarcasm posts/comments

Then there would be a difference

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

There is no difference. The end result is exactly the same.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

This is a good idea, since its so easy to tell tone over text /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I agree. It seems fragile to be be so afraid of... Checks nots purposeless down votes from random that are mostly bots.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't use /s at all. I eschewed it a few years ago.

Some views deserve to be ridiculed, and that's exactly what I'm trying to invite people to do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, but the assholes will think you agree with them, which bolsters them. It's much more fun to write out something they agree with to a T, and then add the /s tag. Completely deflating, utter devastation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

upvoting because this is definitely unpopular. tone is not conveyed in text and various sarcastic phrases need the intonation to be understood as sarcastic.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Oh really?! Tone isn't conveyed in text and you can't detect literal sarcasm unless it's broadcast like a beacon from someone's warped piehole? Like a ship at sea in the calmest waters, you can't find your way home without a lighthouse?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

No, there isn't. Tone is inflection in speech and body-language. In text, you might reasonably think it could be inferred, but that doesn't mean it can't be conveyed. And if someone is missing the inference, piling on "evidence of tone" phrases could be misinterpreted as "more proof of conviction".

Use /s. If you get downvoted because you didn't, that's on you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The problem is readers where English isn’t their primary language.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Or they're neurodivergent. Or they're fucking nazis trying to gaslight new recruits, claiming that the OP isn't actually being sarcastic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I have a modest proposal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Yes? I mean... No? I mean... Help are they being sarcastic?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

I agree! There never is any confusion in text, it's so incredibly obvious when people are being sarcastic. Tones are so easy to portray. /s

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

As someone who has trouble with sarcasm (especially online), a good /s is always helpful.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

I've seen at least 4 misunderstandings on lemmy where someone explicitly asked for a /s tag in the end. It's very much needed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

You’ll get over it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are you advocating tags for all inflections of verbal speach or just sarcasm?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The tag solution in my opinion would be better than the "/s", you could hide sarcasm+ it would be just visually marked.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The weird thing is, using Emojis is like the perfect way to display subtle and varied verbal inflections in text form.. but people here largely refuse to do it because they see it as cringe

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What is the "I'm being sarcastic" emoji?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Back in the forum days it was the wink 😉

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Personally i just go with whatever conveys that i am not being serious, such as any of these 🙄🤧🙃🤔😏.

Though i suppose i should say i am not 12 and have no idea what the cool kids use, probably 💀 or so

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I personally like using 😤 for "confidentally stupid" sarcasm and 😬 for "yikes" sarcasm.

There's also the classic eyeroll 🙄 but that one's usually a bit too aggressive for me.

Oh and 🫠 and 🙃 can work well too!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Emoticons are inherently superior! :{)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Forgot the /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Kaomoji is superiorer ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ooh he's got a lil mustache! That's my favorite emotion!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

:{)>

Goatee man!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

You can be as bitter about it as you like but it absolutely is required. You could come up the most obvious sarcasm you could ever imagine, and I'll find you people that believe you're being sincere.

We live in the post satire era.

I'm not sure how your idea for a sarcasm tag is any different to /s, it seems to be a roundabout way to achieve the exact same thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

yOu DoN't NeEd A sArCaSm TaG!