Did the debate swing her?
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
387 points (96.2% liked)
politics
19097 readers
4506 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This was likely prepared well before the debate, and timed to reach a large audience.
It was mostly a joke, as in I can't picture Taylor being a potential Trump supporter who went Harris cause of the debate
There wasn't really any doubt, but she wanted to have positive points for her argument, not let people say she was just mad about the AI exploitation of her image. I'm sure she's had most of that letter ready to go for weeks, but coming now, she can underline the contrast between Calm and Chaos and if you watched the debate you get it, and if you didn't, you'll see it in the references on the news.
She definitely asked the Harris campaign for the most effective moment. This was it.
Honestly seemed like she wasn't going to for a minute there, after the radio silence on the Trump AI and hanging with Trump supporters.
So, thank goodness, we could use every ounce of help we can get here to destroy this orange menace.
She either endorsed Democrats or pushed voter registration since 2018 either in late September or early October. This was the earliest she has ever injected her opinion to my knowledge.
Dropped 6 minutes after the end of the debate, lmfao what a burn
Every last vote helps. Glad she's using her platform to stand up for reproductive rights.
So signed... childless cat lady.
Good choice!