silence7

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 hours ago

In general, preventing abuse via static rules is really difficult. People who want to abuse the system are innovative. Most systems really depend on having people who respond to the abuse by stopping it more than having specific written rules to block the kinds of abuse that have happened in the past.

 

But only norms and precedents, not laws, prevent this. In our system, the attorney general and the director of the F.B.I. sit within the executive branch and answer to the president.

How might a politically motivated prosecution actually unfold? The steps below show exactly how Trump could make his threats real — all while staying within the constitutional limits on presidential power.

 

Archived copies of the article:

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Political change tends to be like that — nothing at all for a long period when you don't have the power to act, and sudden rapid change when you do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Mostly because the progressives didn't control them in the early 1900s, so they don't have legislature-bypassing initiatives, and even in states where you do have that, it's expensive to get one through.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

While I've known that for a while, a lot of the press was in utter denial months after he gave this money, as with this NYT article dated December 10, 2022

[–] [email protected] 24 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

Four states don't use first-past-the-post for legislative elections. In particular:

  • Alaska - uses a top-4 primary + ranked choice general
  • Maine - uses ranked choice voting
  • California & Washington - use top-two primaries (note: CA can be top-3 if there is a tie for 2nd place)

If a third party wanted to succeed, they would put significant resources into winning legislative and congressional seats in those places. I don't see any of them actually doing that though.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 19 hours ago

They wanted to redact witness names before releasing it.

 

This post uses a gift link which may be limited in how many times it can be viewed. If it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article available

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

An archived copy shows

J.D. Vance Freaks Out Over the Slightest Pushback in V.P. Debate

 

The filing itself is here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

The whole modern commercial web is like that. Pretty much unusable without uBlock origin or the likes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Yep. Needs to have both clearly cheaper up-front costs and longer-term costs paid by the property owner.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It appears possible to scroll the window where you don't have accept/cookie settings buttons fully visible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Against the government is a pretty tough lift in terms of how US law works. Against specific bad actors, there are a lot of lawsuits already.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago

You've got at least a billion dollars less than the people he cares about being liked by.

view more: next ›