this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
198 points (90.6% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3423 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

"We could totally fuck you up if we wanted."

"Go ahead and do it then."

"..."

"I'm waiting."

"...I do not want to."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

That's hilarious bro this putin guy needs his own stand up special he's probably got a million of these

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The internet was literally created by the DoD to have a communication system that was resilient to foreign attacks. If one part of it goes down, it can still work with the parts that aren't down. This is built into the design.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Nope. Usually this claim includes some reference to nuclear war, but the Internet was not designed to withstand attack. Arpanet was not designed with military applications primarily in mind.

https://www.internetmythen.de/en/index0258.html?mythen=myth-15-the-internet-was-invented-by-the-pentagon-and-designed-to-survive-a-nuclear-attack

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Til, thank you

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Russia continuing to signal why it's a good idea to take them out. Thanks, Russia!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I'd say it's a funny way of admitting to the pipeline incident.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah?

And we'd retaliate. Which is why they haven't done it. They didn't shoot down the satellites in the cold war and they aren't going to do it now unless they've decided the world without satellites is just so much better.

How is this news? China could nuke the West Coast tomorrow and the Canadians might invade Maine to secure a maple syrup monopoly! Actually, that's more likely than anything else in this thread...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

If Canada invades I'm fighting on their side. We suck so much and they're polite.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

LMAO, we're a commin' for that syrup 🇨🇦

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I need to give you one more chance to retract, no questions asked. Before this conversation becomes a confrontation.

Edit: Just an American quoting a Canadian show to you. Nothing actually confrontational about it. In fact, everyone who responds with a quote from the same show gets an updoot.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Maine should just be part of New Brunswick but your decorators could never match the right shade of pink

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

The same Russia that "indicated" the Ukraine special operation would take three days?

Lol

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago

Russia said they'd take over Ukraine in three days.

Russia says a lot of shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›