this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

18883 readers
4006 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The law ( the Leahy Law) requires that the US vet any foreign military receiving US arms. However, that doesn’t happen with Israel

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Like someone else said here, it funnels public money into private profits. What I do not get however is this system only furthers inequality which is going to snap the system at some point to the detriment of all, including the billionaires who will increasingly be in a hostile environment. Why shit on your own doorstep when you could make it better for all including yourself and your family. Really foolish thinking but oh well, as really, we seem absolutely committed to this dark path.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

short term profits trump long term savings, none of these people can see beyond the end of the quarter

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fuck Israel. I say this as a Jew so color me antisemitic, the US Congress 🖤

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

You're not antisemitic, you're just stupid.

When the next Holocaust happens (we can see the world persecuting Jews in these very months...), and Israel will be the only one to save you, turn them down, because you obviously hate them so much.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because it turns turns billions in public funds into billions in private profits.

The fact that those profits come at the expense of children's lives doesn't worry the oil and gas industries, so why would it worry weapons manufacturers?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They could get the same effect by arming Ukraine without looking like a bunch of assholes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, that's not how greed works. They'll never say "no thanks, we've made enough profit from Ukraine".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No one's suggesting they say that

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

I am. Would be hella refreshing for these arms dealers to grow a conscience, even if just a tiny one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I think a lot of U.S. politicians and legacy media outlets were genuinely caught off-guard by the backlash. Prior to the Netanyahu era, support for Israel in the U.S. was basically non-controversial. But he fucked that up just like he fucks up everything else.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Netanyahu has been an unmitigated disaster in every conceivable way, for a long time. The Israeli people really need to kick him to the curb.

I mean, at this point he's squandering good will and sympathy generated for Israel after a terrorist group specifically targeted civilians for rape, torture, and murder. It feels like something that should be impossible - I mean, it's not like anyone sane would side with freaking Hamas.

If you're opposed to Hamas, it should be trivially easy to maintain the moral and political high ground over them. Yet he's somehow failing even that.

Cripes, what a clusterfuck.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

I keep reposting this one quote: “The bar to clear was on the ground and y’all brought shovels.”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Seems like the Guardian is all kerpluxed that US is using diplomacy behind closed doors rather than announce everything to the world. Tuff stuff.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

hey now, bootlicking is a perfectly valid form of diplomacy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


There is a rare debate taking place in mainstream foreign policy circles, including among congressional Democrats, about whether the United States should condition its military support for Israel in light of the massive civilian casualties it has caused in Gaza.

According to a recent report in the Israeli media, however, the Biden administration has begun doing exactly that – putting conditions on continued US support for Israel’s war on Gaza.

“[It] would be too resource-intensive – and that’s fair to some extent – to essentially vet the entire Israeli security apparatus for gross violations of human rights,” Josh Paul, a former senior state department official responsible for foreign arms transfers, explained on The Lawfare Podcast last week.

“The department has never concluded that a gross violation of human rights occurred, despite what I would say is incredibly credible and convincing evidence to the contrary,” Paul added.

The Leahy Law is just one of many safeguards meant to stop foreign governments from using American weapons to commit human rights violations and war crimes.

Just two months before the Hamas attacks that led to this brutal round of fighting, the state department instructed embassies worldwide to monitor and report all incidents of harm to civilians involving American-made arms.


The original article contains 848 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

incredibly credible

It's so credible I don't believe it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

This sounds like a job for..