And they'll live stream the evidence again
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Break into laughter and start cheering
sure sounds like he's sending a 'message' to the cult here of what to do if he actually gets locked-up.
My thoughts exactly
If he is not jailed it will be the breaking point for Americans
There are times I wonder if the civil war was a good idea. Just let those confederate states break away from the north. I don't support the idea of a confederacy, nor do I support slavery, but hear me out.
I fully believe that the south on their own would have crumbled as a country, as the new, smaller USA would have told the world "Hey, if you buy goods from the south, just know it's with slave labor. If you buy it from the USA, it's 100% slave free.
After some years, the then democrats (which today would be the republicans....weird, I know), would have screwed their own country up so bad, that I feel each state would have tried to become it's own country. And it's impossible to know where the butterfly takes us from there.
But today we would have a USA that's roughly half the size, quite a bit smaller population wise, but still basically the USA we know today in terms of place in the world.
So now, today, trump would be campaigning down in alabama or florida or some shit, and none of this bullshit would be our problem. Because if he tried campaigning in the USA, he would be shot down HARD. All the racists and confederate flag bearers, and bible thumpers are in the south......and also Ohio for some unexplained reason.
Point is. He would either campaign in a country that won't have him, or campaign in a country that loves him.....but it's not our problem.
It would very much be our problem because then we'd have a nation with fealty to Putin/Russia right on our doorstep.
You would consigned millions of people to remain in slavery as well as their descendants for god knows how many generations for the chance it would maybe have stopped trump, a bigot from New York?
You might want to look at the past two elecctoral college maps before you go blaming everything on the south.
I said "and Ohio". The western states didn't exist back then.
It wouldn't be that clean cut. Yes, a good chunk of the southeast would go but you have plenty of states that are discontiguous or so close to a 50-50 split, that we'd end up with a bunch of 1850s Kansas-Missouri situations.
Donald Trump is from New York.
The closer we get to his sentencing, the more violent his rhetoric will get.
He's right, it would make me drop whatever I'm doing and plan out a party that night. We should do it more often.
I'm trying to imagine what the day should be called?
"Grab em by the bussy" day?
Ah, I'm still working on it....
I don't ever want to hear another republican ever utter the words "We're the party of law and order" ever again...
Let them go off. January 6th showed they are incompetent. Let them push their violence again and put much of the public against them again right before the election. They won’t accomplish anything of importance and they will show their hateful agenda isn’t what most of this country wants. Faced with it directly, most Americans aren’t ready for insurrection and domestic conflict. I think any reactionary violent attack right now will be the end of their movement.
Cult 45 is a bunch of pussies. How many of them are willing to die for a cheeto? There's going to be enough military there this cult will get curb stomped in about .4 seconds. I hope they do, maybe it'll take a few child molesters and a few future mass shooters off this planet.
The Beerhall putsch was terrible planned and executed as well. Past failure doesn’t necessarily mean they will continue to fail.
Yup. Except this time the president won’t hold back the military like Trump did.
Look, I hate Trump.
But I do think he is a symptom of a larger problem. There's a bit portion of America -- Blue and Red -- that aren't being served well by American politics. We have a huge homeless problem, millions can't find good jobs, millions can't afford to rent -- let alone buy -- homes. Higher education costs are through the roof. Health care costs are through the roof. (I guess I should move away from using the expression "through the roof" when discussing how many people are homeless, but I digress.)
We've got big problems and it doesn't matter whether you're Blue or Red or who you blame -- those problems aren't being addressed in a meaningful way.
Trump could disappear tomorrow (Are you listening, God? It's America) and we're still going to have a big portion of our country out of work, out of home and out of health with a bleak future to look forward to.
Desperate people turn to extremism and religion. I'm not excusing that behavior, I'm just pointing out that it doesn't come from nowhere.
People that are happy, secure, treated justly/equally/fairly, have good incomes, can educate their kids, afford healthcare and can retire safely will not try to overthrow their government because there will be no one willing to listen to them.
Well, you're right, but you're missing the fact that Republicans work hard to make and keep these conditions, because their base is made up of the most disaffected people. They block healthcare reform, they block student debt relief, they block first time home buyer assistance - they block all the social programs that would ease these problems. Then they try to dismantle the government entities that work to help these things; did you notice how many of Trump's appointees were vocally against the organizations he put them in charge of? Republicans want the government not to work so that they can say "See, it doesn't work, we need smaller government," and then they can get rid of the regulations and taxes that reduce the (already obscene) profits that corporations make.
So yes, you're right, but it's working as intended for the right.
I agree. I'm not missing the point that Republicans are the cause of this.
I'm (attempting) to point out that Trump is not the cause of our problems. He is the Republican party manifest and when he disappears, his creators will still be here... working on creating Trump II.
If he disapears tomorrow, maybe that'll knock some sense into the republican party and they'll get some actual politicians and work with the democrats instead of blindly voting no and anything they do, regardless of how good it is for people. These problems that you're concerned about wouldn't be problems if the right wasn't trying to make the left look bad. So take the both sides shit and shove it up all the way up your ass.
There's one party who has a lot of people who want to address the problems you point out. There is another party that wants to remove all ability of the government to address any of those problems you mention because they think that will solve the problems.
The problem with the former party is that they can never get a large enough majority to do anything about it. The way our government is set up, you need more than slim majority in both houses to get anything meaningful done, unless you can get everyone of the people in the party to line up behind it, any you'll inevitably have hold outs.
Your post is just more of the "muh both sides!" nonsense. The problem isn't that neither party listens, it's that the one who wants to stop the government from being able to do anything about it keeps getting at least near 50% of the people to vote for them.
Well said, can't upvote this enough.
The kitchen is dirty, and it's on fire.
Yes, the kitchen being dirty is a problem. It probably even contributed to the fire, and makes putting out the fire even harder.
But you have to put out the fire before you can worry about anything else.
Stop playing the 'both sides are the same song.'
The ACA was based on Mitt Romney's Massachusetts plan because Obama wanted to make it easy for the GOP to swallow it.
If the US is in trouble it's because one side has been trying desperately to screw the other and doesn't case if the public suffers too.
The "both sides" argument is a cheap cop out to having a real talk.
Yes, the GOP is the primary obstruction, but the Democrats aren't helping much either.
I vote D all the way down to dogcatcher, but I certainly don't look to them to solve anything.
Seriously. I'm so tired of seeing this "I hate Trump, but..." bullshit. Because that's what it is -- bullshit. Yes, we have problems, MUCH OF WHICH IS CAUSED BY THESE MORON CONSERVATIVES AS WELL AS THEIR GODKING!
You're right. But that would mean politicians would have to stop kowtowing to business, start re-regulating Wall St, and begin to support social justice cause (tax rules, public housing, business regulation, etc). So unfortunately it's unlikely to happen because the whole gd world is so far down the rabbit hole we are blind to what could be.
How the fuck is stochastic terrorism not illegal?
How you gonna wrap a law around it? Hell, even with something as "obvious" as this quote? Trump said nothing that "incites violence". He's playing the mob boss thing, again.
If 01/06 wasn't enough for our government to take action, nothing will be. And again, what would that action even look like?
I've preached many, many times on here and reddit that libs need to get armed, educated and practiced. Is that terrorism? Fuck me. I'm just saying that the conservatives are ready to kill us and we should be prepared to defend ourselves.
It is but only for leftists. Thanks, McCarthy.
I sure hope so.
There's a significant number of Trumpers who are just itching to put on their ~~brown shirts~~ red hats and start wreaking violence.
At this point, it's not really a question of if they do it, but just of when. On that point at least, Trump is right. He just doesnt acknowledge the fact that the reason those people are reaching a breaking point is that he's self-servingly fed them a steady diet of propaganda and hatred.
So they're going to go off the rails - they're vtoo ignorant and too angry and too misled to do anything else.
The worst-case scenario would be that they do it after Trump has (god forbid) been elected. Because then they're going to get official sanction. They really will be the new brownshirts.
The best-case scenario is that they do it soon, and in response to Trump being rightfully sentenced for the crimes of which he has been rightfully convicted. In that case, they're going to have neither the illusion of legitimacy nor official sanction, and they'll just reveal themselves as the lawless, petulant, violent asshats they are.
Right with ya. Problem is, the vast majority of Americans are ignorant of history and have a, "Can't happen here!" attitude.
Fascism isn't coming, it's here, now, today.
You have it right on the best/worst case scenarios. Best case might sober enough people up to turn the ride. Otherwise we're sleepwalking into this.
Is it explicitly stated whom a president may not pardon (eg, themselves)?
If so, no reason to anyone to do anything if he's elected
If he's elected, they'll have free rein to do whatever they want to whoever they want, and they will.
Him being sent to prison would just be a trigger to release the hatred and urge to violence that's already festering inside them. That hatred and urge to violence is still going to be there if he's elected - it'll just manifest a bit differently.
There's nothing saying he can't pardon himself, but a president can only pardon for federal crimes.
For this particular case, he couldn't pardon himself because the president can pardon federal crimes, but in this case the crime is in the New York state court system, so the governor of New York would have to pardon him to my understanding.
The president can only pardon those convicted of federal crimes. He was convicted of state crimes in New York state, and only the governor of New York can pardon those convicted of crimes at the state level.
So he's just gonna strong arm then into doing it.
Now you keep saying that term.....brown shirts......what do UPS delivery drivers have to do with this?
And hopefully either held in jail without bond or be convicted felons who can't vote.