this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
1065 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

70441 readers
2886 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reminder to switch browsers if you haven't already!


  • Google Chrome is starting to phase out older, more capable ad blocking extensions in favor of the more limited Manifest V3 system.
  • The Manifest V3 system has been criticized by groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation for restricting the capabilities of web extensions.
  • Google has made concessions to Manifest V3, but limitations on content filtering remain a source of skepticism and concern.
(page 8) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Oh no! Wait, I don't use that shit because of shit like this.

[–] [email protected] 287 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (24 children)

Now we gotta have websites developing for all web browsers instead of Google Chrome like it's Internet Explorer 2.0.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (10 children)

You sweet summer child.

How long do you think Chrome will let DoH be opt-in?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And they never will.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Man for real.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Firefox Forever!!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

firefox extensions are the best patches i have for enshittification

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Switched to Firefox at work today. Looks like I still need Chrome to do the VPN handshake, but the more of us there are, the more pressure we have on IT!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is that project going to maintain Manifest V2 support?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't have official information, but I doubt it. They tend to stick as closely to the Chromium experience as possible, with the exception of the ungoogled part, of course. Maintaining Manifest V2 support would also just be a massive amount of work, for which they likely don't have the manpower.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have no idea. I'd guess not, as it's not a strong fork like other Chromium-based browsers. Its main selling point is that it's nearly identical to Chrome, but with a lot of the Google garbage stripped out. I don't use it as a daily driver, but only when I need something Chromium-based like the use case mentioned by @[email protected]. It's very likely to work wherever Chrome does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 325 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Other groups don't agree with Google's description, like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which called Manifest V3 "deceitful and threatening" back when it was first announced in 2019, saying the new system "will restrict the capabilities of web extensions—especially those that are designed to monitor, modify, and compute alongside the conversation your browser has with the websites you visit."

Google, which makes about 77 percent of its revenue from advertising, has not published a serious explanation as to why Manifest V3 limits content filtering, and it's not clear how that aligns with the goals of "improving the security, privacy, performance and trustworthiness."

Like Kewisch said, the primary goal of malicious extensions is to spy on users and slurp up data, which has nothing to do with content filtering.

Google now says it's possible for extensions to skip the reviews process for "safe" rule set changes, but even this is limited to "static" rulesets, not more powerful "dynamic" ones.

In a comment to The Verge last year, the senior staff technologist at the EFF, Alexei Miagkov, summed up Google's public negotiations with the extension community well, saying, "These are helpful changes, but they are tweaks to a limited-by-design system.

For a short period, users will be able to turn them back on if they visit the extension page, but Google says that "over time, this toggle will go away as well."


The original article contains 692 words, the summary contains 230 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›