this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
1105 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

14507 readers
1561 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yes, Physics majors are a bit too hierachical with science like there were not doing non-rigorous math themselves but let's be honest: on the other spectrum of real/fake science it is very very hard to find actual people seriously studying the field, like you have to go up to doctorant to find the kind of serious study you find in physic undergrad.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 11 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, political scientists probably don't know where 95% of the politics is hidden either.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Trick question, all politics is local.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure, physicists can just keep track of about 5% of the universe's mass. That's their whole job, and they just got 5%!? Are they stupid??

Who are you to complain Brenda?! The only thing you keep track of is the amount of Oreos you have in the pantry

5% of the universe is still several trillions of tons of mass! Although I suppose a good part of that is your fat ass!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Several trillion tons of mass? I think you're off by many orders of magnitude.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're right.

Earth itself weighs about 7 sextillion tons.

Sextillion in the short scale being to the 24th power while trillions being only 12th power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Science politics.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 11 months ago (2 children)

But it's the physicists' job to find this stuff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

More astrophysicists

[–] [email protected] 48 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, it's not like the mathematics lost any of the numbers. Get your shit together physicists.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dunno. Find me an i in the wild.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

it's not like the mathematics lost any of the numbers

show me Pi then

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I know exactly how to find it, and unless you're a mathematician I'm not sure you're authorized to know.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Well they did demonstrate that in a non trivial system of axioms, there will always be true statements that are unprovable. Do they kinda accepted that they will never be able to find everything. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I mean mathematicians are still missing over 99.999% of prime numbers, so...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (6 children)

, or ℙ for short.

I think that should be all of them, but if you want to check, there are references on the website where we keep all the numbers detailing how to check any number, or to list all of them if you want an arbitrarily large pile or have infinite time on your hands. :)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

The technical term you're looking for is "almost all" prime numbers. Not joking btw.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

They haven't even found more than two factors, one of which is one, for any prime number, either.

Get it together, Mathematicians.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›