this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
639 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

15696 readers
1517 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess the "freedom of the press" forum leadership spot was already taken?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The UN: how can we be more of a joke to the world??

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Well we know his wife won't be driving him to the meetings

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reality really is beyond satire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The UN is a captured organization. It no longer serves its purpose, and is now an arm of the oil producing countries state departments more than anything. I don't have a good suggestion for what to replace it with but it's sure AF not worthy of being respected any longer.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The UN's purpose is

"To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;"- United Nations Charter, Chapter I: Article 1: Section 1

the other sections reference international friendship and equal rights, but section 1 is the meat f why it exists, the UN was created after two World Wars, it's primary goal is to prevent a third and has so far been overwhelmingly successful.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We've avoided world wars by allowing conflicts to fester around the globe. I'd be curious whether the death toll would be higher had there been a world war, but I guess there's still plenty of people left to die in forgotten places like Sudan so the calculation will have to wait.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't think peace through submission was the original goal here though is the point

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Did it ever serve it's purpose?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The whole point was a united nation front to avoid another Nazi war, but they gave the blue hats no teeth. It served purpose for purpose sake but no real action

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm young and ignorant, so I don't know what I'm talking about and I'd be open to anyone posting any links for me to learn from. But I remember being in middle and high-school 20 years ago, and learning about the UN's "millennium goals" that they were trying to achieve by 2015. And they were... awesome. Like the real definition of awesome. They were awe-inspiring. And they made me hopeful as a young teen. And I remember when 2015 came and went and they hadn't even come close to meeting those goals. And I remember thinking, okay, well, they'll keep trying. But they didn't keep trying, and in fact I never heard anyone talk about the millennium goals ever again. And then 2016 came, and at least from my American-centric viewpoint, the world has been on a rapid decline since then. And I am honestly so hopeless, like rock bottom hopless, like, I don't know what the future is gonna be, but i can't imagine a good one if we stay on this path, and I don't know what to do, because I'm not a world leader.

I used to have so much respect and admiration for the UN but they're just as garbage as every other power in the world. This post is a fucking joke. My ex partner is from Saudi. I remember excitedly asking him about his opinion and his families opinion when women were first given permission to drive and he was DISGUSTED. Said "this should have happened ages ago, Saudi is using this as a PR move, why should we be happy that women are just now getting this right?"

Anyway. Sorry for the long response to your sarcastic comment. Have a good day. Xoxo.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry that your faith in supranational organisations was so thoroughly squashed. It do be like that though. For a little while, Truman hoped that all nuclear weapons could be put under the control of the UN. Then that went belly up when the soviet union under Stalin learned how to build them. Theres always the IAEA though.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Truman never wanted that. He flew around knowing that his nukes gave him an advantage over the USSR. From this paper, it is clear that Truman wanted to maintain an atomic monopoly and as for Joint Chiefs of Staff, they didn't want to share the nuclear secrets with any organization including the UN.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

At one point I'm sure it was helpful to someone. Now it's just a weapon the oil producing countries plus China of the world wield against the rest.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No third world war yet. So i assume yes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is an incredibly low bar to judge any organization. There are multiple conflicts going around the world that UN has done nothing to do. When it comes to permanent members of the Security council, the UN is powerless. Heck, it is powerless if one of the permanent members decides to flex it's muscles somewhere else geographically either.

Also, no world war is also largely due to presence of nukes with nations. The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction prevents nations from going into full blown wars when 2 nuclear powers are involved.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Man, the world’s gonna be a MUCH better place when the House of Saud finally goes the way of the dinosaur.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unless it's just replaced with something objectively worse...which wouldn't be the first time in history something like that happened.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This oil fields aren’t moving. If the Saus family is ousted, we just talk to the new family

What I would to see is a Saud realizing he’s on the outs, crying on the tarmac. But that’s just mean

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This oil fields aren’t moving.

Yes they are. We've been moving them out of the ground and into the atmosphere for almost ninety years.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They already massacred Yemen as a monarchy while their crown prince is known for dismembering journalists, they're about as bad as it gets.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Maybe I'm just cynical, but I can imagine many, many ways it could get worse and only a few of them involve nuclear or bio weapons.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

UN trolling hard these days. Damn

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

After COP 28 this totally makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

Well, if you want to know how gender inequality works, just ask the Saudis.

[–] [email protected] 156 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's next? North Korea as chair of the human rights forum?

[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Israel for world peace!
America for workers rights!
Turkmenistan for world trade!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Marocco for the Decolonization Committee! Luxemburg for the United Nations Population Fund!

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago

Russia for LGBT+ rights

[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fucking stupid timeline we're trapped in

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

He fried for your sins!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Chick-fil-a is mediocre at best.

Just saying.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough. If you want to solve the problem of gender equality, give it to the experts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 158 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›