politics

This is the reason this crap keeps happening. DJT can say whatever the fuck he wants and suffers no repercussions. One random person alludes to violence on a tiny website used by approximately 470,000 people and we immediately censor them. I get it, rules for the plebs not for the kings. I also get that it is out of your control mod and snowflakes are going to report everything they can get away with and your job is to do your job.

Steve Bannon can issue a call activating lone wolves, DJT can say there will be a bloodbath if he’s not elected. DJT can try to incarcerate political opponents because they dared investigate him, DJT can send a mob to the Capitol to try and stay in power.

Billy Bob from down the street with absolutely no power or following can make a statement calling for violence, that motherfucker will get banned in a heart beat.

Just pointing out that things seem a little backwards. Like the cards are stacked against us.

I’d like to upvote them but I don’t want to be put on a list.

Cheney was Vice President, so he should be able to kill him with a drug, or a lit cigarette.

Of course the SCOTUS won't give their decision on this until after the election so that they can either A) give Trump unilateral power if he wins or B) ensure Biden doesn't get that power if he wins.

Only reason I can think why the SCOTUS didn't rush to making a decision on making the President a literal dictator.

Really? Bcz last I checked we gave Israel billions of dollars in military aid while they were indiscriminately bombing Gaza. He may not have pulled the trigger, but that doesn't make him innocent either.

I'm not sure what you're upset about in my comment.

All of the candidates have faults, but I do have a strong preference for one and one of them is an objectively better candidate on basically all issues (including the issue that all candidates share the wrong stance on).

And it very much is a toss up. 2 candidates in particular are trading leading positions on different polls. There's probably gonna be less than half of eligible voters actually voting. And when they do, one candidate will almost definitely win the popular vote. And when they do it will once again be up to our antiquated electoral system to determine which of the candidates actually gets the seat. It's not 1932, Trump very well could win and that's bad.

If you think my critiques of Trump are the same as my recognition of success for Biden and that I'm somehow "both-sides-ing" I'm really not sure how to help you.

They're talking about the projected results, not their merits as candidates. Their whole point was that the main grievance against Biden also applies to all other candidates, yet only Biden is being dinged for it.

I didn't read this as a "both sides" comment. It looks to me like the "toss up" is about who is likely to win the election, rather than who deserves this commenter's vote. The reason it's close to a toss up is because there are enough violent racists willing to vote for the violent racist.