this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
352 points (98.1% liked)

politics

23540 readers
2474 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's all a circus to make them both look like they are doing what they are supposed to. So they can steal from you without you paying attention.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As always, Thomas and Alito have to demonstrate what pieces of crap they are.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The presidents a criminal. Can't we just send him away without due process? Oh wait, he's got money. Its easy to be a criminal when you have access to cash. I forgot

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I wonder how many more unfavorable rullings the court has to make before trump starts demanding they be arrested.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?

  • Henry II
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

he doesn't even have to go that far. he could just tweet their home address and say they're the "enemy of the people"

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

That's the crazy thing. So many Republicans in congress have said they are afraid for their safety if they go against Trump. He's got the government in a vice grip. They clearly don't agree with how far he's gone, they've said as much privately, but refuse to vote against him in bills bcz Trump followers at this point are crazy.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

So many Republicans in congress have said they are afraid for their safety if they go against Trump

i have less than zero sympathy. fuck them

They clearly don’t agree with how far he’s gone, they’ve said as much privately, but ref7se to vote against him in bills bcz Trunl followers at this point are crazy.

they should have thought of that before they signed on to supporting a rabid full-blown cult and their con man leader just to oWn TeH LiBs. again, fuck them. i'm not saying i hope they die, but i'm not not saying that either

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 140 points 2 days ago (3 children)

He always conflates the US and himself. He’s saying he is in danger if he doesn’t get what he wants.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Or possibly the US is in danger if he doesn't get what he wants. Because he will make sure of it. Continue... to make sure of it...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›