this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
684 points (99.6% liked)

politics

23681 readers
2650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration’s tariff scheme appears less and less likely to bring manufacturing jobs back to U.S. shores.

Businesses across the country are crunching the numbers and realizing that, despite Donald Trump’s insistence, they can’t balance out his tariff hikes across the supply chain.

“Some manufacturers who had plans to open factories in the country say the new duties are only adding to the significant obstacles they already faced,” Bloomberg reported Friday.

That’s because the supply chain to produce those goods in the United States simply isn’t there, requiring companies to import raw materials and factory equipment—which Trump’s tariffs have made unaffordable—from abroad.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Right, this is why an intelligent leader might use tariffs to bring back manufacturing, in a very targeted way and matched with incentives to help build what is missing.

This is someone who heard that you could use a hammer in conjunction with nails to build a house so starts swinging mjolnir in every direction

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Assuming rebuilding manufacturing is the intended goal, how feasible is it to start at the local level, as if in a preindustrial society? That means towns would be going back to having their own smiths, bakers, butchers, like in preindustrial times? Guess that's a consequence of deindustrializing—go back to making handmade stuff since the local businesses that once mass-produced closed long ago.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Feasible? Only in smallish communities surrounded by arable land. The urban and suburban life needs large scale industry to function at all.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Tariffs aren't designed to bring manufacturing back. It's designed to crush the US economy for Daddy Putin. It's designed to starve out the plebs. It's designed to bankrupt companies to be bought by the billionaire class for pennies on the dollar.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Leave Russia out of it. It's your own rigged election system and lack of real competition that led to this

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not American nor living in the USA.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

You left out the most important reason: getting people to come kiss Trump's ass to ask for exemptions. Nothing is more important than getting Trump the sycophancy he has to settle for in lieu of respect.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

People keep ignoring this...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

I don't personally think it's true. I think Trump's first term he spent all day and night on putins dick and this term he is trying to achieve a similar staying power. He wants to be more powerful than Putin.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago

The math is such that I expect to see companies that make things in the us leave. Makes more sense to build in the UK and add the 10% tarriff for your thing made of chinese parts than absorb the XX% chinese tarriffs and have to raise the price even more in the us. If the product is sold abroad at all its a slam dunk to move out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

You mean that this plan was not fully thought out and is just another reactionary policy that will do more harm than good? Shocking!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can't make long term plans for building factories, sourcing raw materials and hiring people if the Dynamite Monkey in Chief can blow it all up on a whim.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

As well, why would you when you can just hunker down for 4 years and wait for the next administration to get rid of the tariffs? They already have millions and billions invested outside of the country. Why spend that much again for a potentially short term problem?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Just imagine the profits from artificial scarcity, end of times riots and price gouging the ever living shit out of every citizen you can.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

that's what happens when you have zero fucking plan at all

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

You got to stop to call them incompetent. It's on purpose. They're traitors and are yearning for a crash.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't fall for the simple explanation. Both answers are true. The objectives are all about greed and betrayal, but the means are still heavily driven by incompetence. Just because someone is a criminal does not make them a competent criminal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Theyre not competend at leading a government.

Theyre very competend in destruction of it, and since that's their goal, it's dangerous to assume they're incompetent.

Never underestimate your foes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There are easier, safer way to crash the economy that are far less public

I get the feeling those who insist there is a plan, just don't want to admit the emperor has no clothes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Arent they following Project 2025?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Which is hardly a plan.. more like a collection of terrible ideas

Remember that the entire Tariff nonsense is the brain child of Navarro who literally invented a supposed expert to justify how they could work. This is literally a fraudulent idea to fill a shitty book that, by terrible happenstance, found an idiot stupid and powerful enough to implement it

We are lucky Trump did not find Jack and Beanstalk first or he would be opening holes anywhere to plant magic seeds

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

You mean any knowledge at all about anything or thinking ahead , which this administration hasn't done at all, seeing as they and DOGE have just cut jobs everywhere and then these agencies have to hire people back because they're understaffed and shit is falling apart.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago

You mean “cOnCePts Of a PlAn” don’t count?

load more comments
view more: next ›