this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
1260 points (93.3% liked)

memes

14675 readers
4666 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

If anything, this is more how money corrupts tech folks.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

2030: By the implementation of AI, the orphan crushing machine can now process 35% more biomass per hour, providing a sustainable power source to our server parks

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I feel like all the people who were into tech to improve people's lives did that and got bought out by people who then went on to try and make money off of it.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh I am still at the 2014 phase.

We... used to have a term for people that advanced further: sell-outs.

Though I do very much prefer the recently popularized Cyberpunk lingo:

Fucking Corpo Scum.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sorry, but I feel 2014 should be replaced with 1980, 2018 should be replaced with 2000... Maybe 1990. But the whole monetisation thing started loooonngg before 2025.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Bad meme. Implies "information wants to be free" leads to "have you considered monetizing empathy?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I disagree. It’s not “one leads to the other,” it’s that people change. Far too often people start out, not just in tech, bucking the system in some way. Anti-authority, pro-privacy, anti-centralized control, etc.

But when the server costs start mounting for a service that gets popular and money needs to come in, people change. Now you need to monetize via ads or whatever, now you get attacked, you circle the wagons, get investors, and it’s all downhill from there.

Digg and Reddit are big examples, Google could arguably be a similar case, it happens in music too where a band “sells out”, like Metallica for example. An originally anti-authority metal band starts lawsuits and banning fans to protect profits.

Sure there are plenty of situations where services remain open and free (for now), like wikipedia, linux distros, etc. but we aren’t always that lucky.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

yeah, the “information wants to be free” and the other two are completely different people….
it’s more like, 3 different kinds of tech people:

also, i’m going to call this “tech-bro” thing sexism… women are awesome in tech and the field can be very exclusionary… just because society has been keeping women out of tech, doesn’t mean you can just assume they’re all bros….

also check out unixsocks… they’re definitely not bros….

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"Techbro" is a specific name for a subsection of the tech population who have become complete douche canoes (much like the middle and right people in the image). The crypto/AI/whatever people. These people are mostly male.

All kinds of awesome people work in tech, but they are not considered "tech bro", just cool tech people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago

Tech-Bro is an almost exclusively male subsection of people in Tech, who think that A. Tech solves everything B. As people doing Tech, they know everything C. Any non-tech attempt at solving something is bad.

This isn't a sexist term.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I could be wrong, but I think "tech-bro" as a term isn't meant to apply to everyone in tech. It's mean to capture the intersection of tech people and "bros" -- the kind of guy who likes football or something.

Of course that's just what it's meant to be; if people use it for all men in tech then yeah it just becomes a sexist and luddite terminology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I've heard that "argument" about a lot of slurs. Do you think any non-tech person is involved or interested enough to make any difference between the good tech-males and the bad tech-bros? Besides, why would there be a problem with a guy who likes football?

BTW. Men are not the victims of that slur. The subtext is that good girls don't do tech. Or if they do, they at least don't make waves. They don't invent things, become rich tech CEOs, or anything else that someone might find objectionable. They can become artists and make pretty things, or authors and write about their feelings; that sort of thing. You know, girl stuff.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I work with these fucking yuppies every day and I hate them so fucking much.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This kinda follows the same pipeline that everyone else went down on Facebook and Twitter. At one point, the internet was all about Anonymous and Zeitgeist and revolution.

Then one Arab Spring and a couple of years later, we all went from Anonymous and Zeitgeist to thinking that billionaires and businessmen are the answers to all of our problems.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know that it was ever as much like that--I think the earlier adopters of those technologies were more like that, and as the general public gained interest and increased usage, the trend swung the other way. Remember in 2005 when owning a mac device basically initiated you into a cult? Apple stores were set up like sanctuaries where people came to worship.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a good point. The big shift probably also coincides with more of the masses getting online. Back in 2005 I was a Symbian user and we used to laugh at the Apple people paying crazy premium prices for 'smart' phones that couldn't even multitask.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I feel like most of tech had already sold out by 2014. Really by the late aughts it seemed to be all gone; that was when apple and its philosophy had taken hold. Not that apple was the only force in that direction, it just felt like the apotheosis of the greedy and controlling mentality. MS had plenty of greed, but they were willing (in some circumstances) to play ball. Google seemed to love interoperability in the early-to-mid aughts, but look at it now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Even by the 90's, it was already accepted that being good with computers could be a great career path to make money. When I went to university in early 00's, people who were on an engineering track commonly went into computers because the salaries were better than other engineering fields.

There were some people who loved the tech, but a lot of them made the choice due to financial reasons.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Money .... it's always about the money and power

I'm sure there are tech bros out there that we will never hear about or see or know about .... those are the ones who just want to do tech stuff and not care about anything else

The ones we do hear about who become billionaires were only ever in it for the money and power

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Tech Bro" as a term though does pretty much imply insufferable nouveaux-riche douchbags devoid of any genuine emotion, who are happy to squash human dignity on an industrial scale for profit, and think themselves cool for doing it.

If someone is into tech for the true sake of technology then by definition they aren't a "tech bro" - they are a programmer, a hacker, a hardware tinkerer, an open-source evangelist, or any number of cool things that don't involve being an huge dickhead :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

It's really just about power, but money is one of the best ways to obtain it.

[–] [email protected] 98 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"I want to change the world with this tech"

...

"3 billion you say? The company is yours!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Honestly selling the company is understandable. Getting out is normal.

It's the ones that turn into sociopaths that bother me.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 days ago (13 children)

I mean a lot of us talk big game but I’m sure many of us would sell out for a 9 figure acquisition. Hell for 7.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, precisely because we would cash out and settle for peaceful lives long before we'd become billionaires or even millionaires. It takes a certain type of person to begin earning millions and conclude "that's not nearly enough, I need this times a thousand". None of them are "good" people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You don't usually just "begin earning millions", some businesses snowball to billion-dollar size quite quickly. Instagram had only a few dozen employees before being sold to Facebook for billions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

It happens, especially in tech, but I'd say it's still the exception to the norm.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

7 figures??? That's not selling out, that's just trying to get anything for a sinking ship if you sell for a million. Thats barely covering salary+expenses for 2-5 engineers depending on level and location.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I’m talking about taking a seven figure personal payout to walk away from my company and let some asshole handle it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How many here are working for these tech bros or putting money on their companies?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

The company I work for isn't amazing and our most recent CEO is human garbage. I've got medical stuff I had to pay for and need the funds to get out of country. Doing my best to be a net drain though by working as slowly and poorly as I can without being fired and I don't buy into tech stock (or most any stock for that matter). Idk if what I'm doing is as ethical as it could be but I'm doing my best to not support unhinged tech bros despite being in tech

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

We have a ton of developers on lemmy. It is entirely possible one of them will face this dilemma one day.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Its ai generated sir but it kinda checks out.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ironically brought to you by the same tech bros it's dissing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Probably not a techbro, but it's ironic nonetheless.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Am I stupid? Idk what the hell this is trying to say

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's not something that's unique to tech, but I read it as a joke about enshittification due to greed.

Lots of start-up companies start out all idealistic and positive, then don't stay true to that mission as the founders age and want more (or sell out to a bigger company).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Also as an aside, if stock points cripples your integrity then you never had any to begin with

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I honestly think delusion is a core component of startup culture. There's this energy of overly sincere rich kids who think they can make the world a better place by perpetuating a system of exploitation

It's kinda tragic really

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I do envy their ability to take such big risks though (often because they have money to fall back on, I assume).

I've never been in a position to take a risk like that without jeopardizing my (and now my family's) future.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh yeah there's definitely a joy to it. I think doing crazy things when your young and inspired is core experience in life. It's a shame most people are in your position and can't rely on the support of their community to fall back on if the risk fails

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

The feeling of power that being in the technology sector brings changes a man.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

IDK what this meme is trying to say. Its making some leaps.

[–] [email protected] 144 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›