this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
149 points (96.3% liked)

Slop.

505 readers
416 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

No. She CANNOT win.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago

HAHAHAHAHHAHA IT WAS A DEBATE! IT WAS A DEBATE! AND THERE WERE JOURNALISTS THERE COVERING THE DEBATE. AND IN A DEBATE WHEN YOUR OPPONENT FOUGHT FOR SEGREGATION YOU CAN'T WIN THE RACISTS OVER. SO YOU PRETEND TO BE SLIGHTLY LESS RACIST

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago

you don't understand having a strong and lethal military is the cornerstone of right and left wing ideologies

Someone arguing about how she lost when pointing out she ran on a mostly gop lite platform

[–] [email protected] 64 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Unless they just decide not to run primaries there's no shot. She couldn't even win her home state last time and dropped out to save herself the embarrassment

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Unless they just decide not to run primaries

... Again

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

"This is a time of crisis! Trump is in the white house and making a mockery of our democracy! So in order to push for unity and for the defense of American democracy we have decided to not run any potentially divisive primaries."

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Maybe she can put out another staged video of Obama talking down to black men for not wanting to vote for her.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

She didn't have name recognition back then and the party didn't have a reason to rally around her. Now, especially if she becomes governor of California, she's the path of least resistance.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

Name recognition is important but she's also the only Democrat to have lost the popular vote in my lifetime so worth considering a blank slate is better

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

the path of least resistance.

Smh so much for #resist

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

straight up dropped the day before California's deadline to have your name removed from the ballot

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago

Damn I didn't remember it was that blatant lmao

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The dems will run Harris because they want to lose in order for them to not be at the helm for WW3.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago

Democrats will do literally anything other than demand that the genocide end.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm starting to wonder if they ran her in 2024 because they wanted to not be at the helm of the continuing genocide

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That would be more plausible if chuck and others weren't out saying they were just in power to make Israel look good/do PR

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

“The expansion of Israel and its proxies are a fundamental necessity for the United States”

  • Tim Walz during the VP debate
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 weeks ago

They Learned a LOT! AND if you Donate a Couple more Dollars they'll Learn even MORE!

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is facebook tier boomer rage bait material

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago

Deeply unserious

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

awesome. hope she loses again

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

she would eat shit in primary tbh (if it happens)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

Last one that wasn’t a proven sham was in what, 2008? Not holding my breath for Dems to be democratic any time soon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're still supporting that genocide-loving succdem?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

remember when she did an hour-long livestream going to the mat for Biden when the decision to replace him had already been made behind closed doors? absolutely amazing political judgment on her part. funnier than the first time they kept her off the oversight committee and chose a terminal cancer patient instead.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 weeks ago

They won't even let her win a committee chair, you think they'd let her win a presidential primary? Even after fully compromising all the beliefs she pretended to have?

load more comments
view more: next ›