this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
703 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

69705 readers
3115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

TIL teen girls still used Facebook.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 hours ago

Goddam I had to read that headline 3 times before I understood the implication!
That is outright disgusting, and such practices ought to be outlawed.
Or as Trump would say, very cool and very legal way to make money.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Happy I got AdNauseam after uBlock Origin. Deleted my facebook a year ago, shit is an AI slopfest built upon the greed and manipulation of every part of the chain. Defcon 31 has a good talk that brings this up. "Disenshittify or die" by Cory Doctrow, cann recommend to watch.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

I support the use of AdNauseam. Not sure if there are any more extreme alternatives, I now choose to be actively hostile towards advertising/tracking rather than just passively blocking it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 hours ago

That's some cartoon villain level shit jfc

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 hours ago

I'm so glad I quit Facebook long ago and also started using uBlock Origin.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

This type of advertising isn’t new. There is that famous (although the claims from the father have been questioned) New York Times article written by Charles Duhigg in 2012. A father of a teenage girl in Minnesota got upset for receiving coupons from Target for infant care related products. As the story goes, he later learned his daughter was in fact pregnant. It turns out Target was using some predictive algorithm to identify would-be mothers and straight up sending them coupons for infant care products. It seems ever since this article was published that they stopped doing this in such a direct manner. Again, there have people who questioned the validity of the claims for this specific story, but Target did confirm they were doing this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

My doctor's office (allegedly) handed my info to a plastic surgery clinic so they could send me a "happy 40th birthday, now fix your sagging bullshit!"-email the literal day I turned 40.

Needless to say that put a damper on things.

People have been doing evil shit for money since the invention of money. These days it's just automated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I think I read somewhere that that was apocryphal, but it strikes me as 100% plausible. It doesn't even have to be a matter of "write a system that detects pregnant women via their purchase history and send them coupons for maternity stuff" I think Amazon's Frequently Bought Together feature could get it done. The same algorithm that suggests a tacklebox and some lures when you have a fishing pole in your shopping cart might recommend diapers and formula to those who buy maternity pants.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Teenagers should not be on social media. I rest my case.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, but the genie is already out of the bottle. Arguing like this is kinda pointless.

I don't think it will be possible to get them off social media (or the internet in general), so you need to find ways to make it work.

E.g. minors can not be advertised to, no algorithmic content, no doom-scrolling, and heightened data protection. I think teenager should get access to as much as possible to reduce the "risk" of them trying to go around it. "Their" version of social media might even be the superior one in the end.

If the world wasn't on fire at the moment, people could calmly discuss possible solutions and propose laws in every country to actually protect their children from e.g. the stuff mentioned in the linked article. Sadly, this isn't going to happen ...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The thing is that social media have an oversized influence that makes a calm discussion of possible solutions very hard to have. When the US recognized the implications of letting a foreign power exert so much control over their people, they tried banning TikTok, or breaking it up so their US operation would be under US control.

Facebook should also be split and its EU operation purchased by a European company, that could then spend more time implementing the other changes you mention (doom-scrolling, data protection) and less time lobbying to get all these pesky EU regulations removed.

And yes, it does feel heartbreaking to count the US as a threat to national security, but China has never threatened to annex Greenland with military force, so what would have been paranoia and extreme anti-americanism last year is now the sensible, level-headed thing to do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

No one should

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 hours ago

Not just teenagers. Facebook and quite a few others should outright be banned. Not only they are scientifically proven to be a mental health catastrophe and a political threat to democracy, it's also pretty clear now that both these things are part of their design, not bugs or unintended emerging properties.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 hours ago

Be aware that the companies would have paid Facebook handsomely to identify users in this way. The world we live in has a sickness with greed for money at its heart.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Fucking hell. That is vile!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

How did they come up with this idea? Did the algorithm suggest this pattern, or did someone in marketing come up with it?

[–] [email protected] 94 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Saint Luigi deliver us from villains like Facebook

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

As if there would be no social networking without Zuckerberg.

Like any sin, the change starts with us. If we want a healthy social network, we can build a healthy social network.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 hours ago

Tom from Myspace never treated us like this.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 hours ago

Praise the king!

load more comments
view more: next ›