this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
202 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23206 readers
3491 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Here is something I’ve been curious about. Congress has undisputed constitutional control of tariffs. A previous Congress enacted a law to delegate some of that authority to the President.

So now.. how can the President (or anyone) just say, “fuck you, you can’t have your constitutional power back?” Why can’t Congress just fall back to their constitutional authority and render their predecessors’ delegation invalid?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

President can veto any bill. It will go back to Congress and needs (I think) 2/3 to override the veto

[–] [email protected] 22 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

That's a good way to turn the Senate against you

[–] [email protected] 18 points 12 hours ago

Orrr force them to continue doing nothing for forever as previously scheduled before public outrage. Now they can throw their hands up and act like they tried.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The Senate will decide your fate

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

I AM THE SENATE - Trump, 2025

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago

great. another way you put the tariff debacle on yourself.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If trump vetos (which we all know he would) can't the senate overturn his veto? Though I think a vote to overturn would require 2/3 majority

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago

can I drive you

[–] [email protected] 45 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Well, technically he can. Then Congress can just override it with two-thirds majority. Grow those spines — you got this.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

So, if this is initially approved with a 2/3 majority can he still veto it and then they have to vote again? Or is there such a thing as a “veto-proof” initial passing?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They always need to vote again, sometimes a president veto will cause a bill to lose support and reps have an opportunity to change their vote.

Sometimes though presidents won't veto if it passes initially at that threshold, depending how embedded they are in their perspective.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 17 hours ago

Thank you for explaining. I feel like I’m becoming an armchair constitutional process hobbyist this year (against my natural inclinations). I appreciate you, and all the knowledgeable people who take the time to help educate.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago

Supreme Court: He's got you there, come again next time you want to try and claw back congressional powers from a fascist

[–] [email protected] 58 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

If he had 3 brain cells to rub together, he'd take this offramp and say "The tariffs were beautiful, and working perfectly, but the China-loving RINOs and Democrats killed them before we brought manufacturing back to our shores and eliminated income taxes."

[–] [email protected] 36 points 18 hours ago

And what's funny is MAGA would lap it up. We've always been at war with Eastasia.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not yet... hey, where did the Jedi run off to?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

Busy adjusting their stock portfolios.

[–] [email protected] 130 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Super fun, watching our president reject every possible off-ramp with hostility only to later freak out and panic when there are no more off-ramps left. Fucking moron

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

did you know he often shits himselfs when he flys into a rage, the producers on his show later revealed how often he did it,

[–] [email protected] 45 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

He's too much of a narcissist to take the off-ramps provided by other people. He has to come up with one himself so he can claim he's the expert dealmaker who saved us all.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 15 hours ago

That's not an off-ramp, it's a cliff.