this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
249 points (93.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40014 readers
810 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For example:

  • You MUST use Apple’s own apps (iMessage, Phone, etc.) as well as Apple’s own App Store
    • To be fair, the EU is doing work to solve this particular issue…but most of the reforms are only for EU customers
  • You have to use WebKit when developing a browser for ~~macOS~~ iOS and iPadOS, you can’t use Gecko or Blink
  • iOS apps must be developed using XCode IF YOU WANT TO PUBLISH IT ON THE APP STORE, which is only available on MacOS…

~~That last one is weird. Why can’t you compile Swift outside of MacOS (i.e. third party IDEs)? Why can only XCode do it?~~

edit: Gecko and Blink based browsers are available on macOS. I learnt something new today. Not for iOS or iPadOS though. Also, Xcode is only a requirement for publishing in the App Store. You are able to compile Swift in any OS. You'll just need to distribute the app via sideloading and/or third-party app stores (in the EU)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

 did license macOS out several decades ago. There were issues between hardware and software so they quit and brought it back under their umbrella so it’s integrated. That’s my understanding.  was nothing much when the iPhone came out.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Missing the news lately?

A billionaire bought the white house.

Enjoy Oligarchy! 🫠

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Corruption

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Swift compiles anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

How is it allowed? That's the American way, baby!

How is it possible? People buying Apple products. Their walled garden seems to be a point of pride amongst many users. Not many people actually need Apple products, it's a choice.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

While I broadly agree with your sentiment,

Why can’t you compile Swift outside of MacOS

You can compile Swift on Windows and Linux. There are other tools required to build macOS and iOS-apps bundled with XCode that prevents building those on other platforms, but Swift itself is available standalone.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because america is for the companies, not its citizens

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Envelopes of cash

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Apple isn't a monopoly.

In personal computing and smartphones, Apple has competition. Because Apple has competition, even if it is only one other major company, Apple won't be forced to unbundle services.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Monopolies are not the only thing that governments are supposed to prevent. Anti competitive practices are supposed to be illegal regardless of monopoly status. The same is true of cartel behavior.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Regulations on cartel behavior is usually linked more to price fixing, not industry practice. Also, there is consumer choice on being forced into a single app store, get an Android phone.

And Apple has been forced to allow for in app purchases, the most cartel like behavior between the two stores.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you at least concede that it has the behaviors similar to that of a monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Yeah, but the law genuinely treats (near-)monopolies differently from their competitors. What's legal for a small company does not have to be for a company which dominates the market.

The thing is, laws are supposed to bring the greatest benefit to a society. In most cases, fairness aids that goal. But that's not the case for competition laws, which is why they're relatively unintuitive.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because it's the top American company. US protects Apple and allies can't work against that. Now that US and EU relationship is deteriorating we'll see loads of lawsuits against Apple pop up in Europe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How do you define 'top company'?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And cultural impact. Americans are super patriotic about Apple and don't even notice it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Eh, they're perceived as more "lefty" than most of the stereotypically "patriotic" corporations of the US.

There are a couple of reasons for this: (1) Steve Jobs has/had a "crunchy granola" reputation (despite likely being a crypto fascist) due to likening himself to civil rights leaders and other "woke" people and living in California, and (2) they have a large amount of usage by people in the creative arts such as music producers, visual artists, and other people who the right would call "woke" without blinking an eye.

I think it's all perception, and they are easily just as fascistic as the rest of the corporations. But they try to stay on the good side of a lot of people that care deeply -- or at least claim to care deeply -- about eroding democratic norms, and the rolling back of people's rights and that produce a lot of the cultural artifacts the right largely hates, but are broadly-speaking massively popular.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because the political right doesn't actually like functional markets.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Free markets are mostly a myth.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

entirely free markets result in facebook, google, amazon, but worse, where they have absolutely no restrictions. a. iddle ground is needed, that we don't have currently

load more comments
view more: next ›