this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
489 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Remember 2004? Howard Dean caught hell for getting too excited then they criticized John Kerry for not being exciting enough

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I finally just watched it, and especially paid attention to verbal missteps that people are talking about ……

….. I saw lots and took way too long to realize YouTube search had given me the 2022 state of the union. Oops

….. back on track with the current one, and the President was on fire. So much livelier and more expressive than two years ago! Definitely kicked ass and laid to rest the idea that he is too old

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why are people still even talking about his verbal missteps? I ignore anyone who rags on his stutter. He's got a legitimate medical condition, and he works hard in his speech therapy to talk as well as he does. It has nothing to do with his mental ability, as there are young people with the same issue.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Sure, however he also succeeded is coming across more confident, assertive, clearheaded than he had a couple years before. The rest of us can only dream of that when we get to his age

[–] [email protected] 58 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The “he was too partisan” comments annoyed the shit out of me. Republicans are nothing if not hypocritical snowflakes.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago

That's why i stopped giving their words any weight. They'll complain no matter what, so fuck em

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

It's wrong for someone to talk quickly trying to destroy people with facts and logic! No President should be allowed allowed to angrily yell at a crowd in a long speech! I need to watch Ben Shapiro and Trump for hours now because I'm so angry about these things Biden did!

[–] [email protected] 63 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

"Too woke! More sleepy please"

[–] [email protected] 147 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The comments from the article were surprisingly not bad. One made a good point:

The POTUS started his SotU speech with:

“Now it is we who face an unprecedented moment in the history of the Union. And yes, my purpose tonight is to both wake up this Congress, and alert the American people that this is no ordinary moment either. Not since President Lincoln and the Civil War have freedom and democracy been under assault here at home as they are today.”

I have watched a lot of state of the union addresses and I cannot remember one that began with this stark of warning.

Yet, all the articles being posted are about MTG and whether Biden looked/didn’t look old and who clapped and who didn’t.

That’s a 5-alarm fire bell he just rang, broadcasted out to the entire country and world, pay attention to what’s important

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

People forget that the point of the speech is right in the title. It's not about the health of the country or political ideals.

Once a year, the President delivers a speech on the stste of the union. It's about how divided the country is and whether or not that division is a threat to the nation.

If the country went full-fascist without a struggle that wouldn't threaten the Union. If the Republicans were voted out of existence and we became a socialist utopia that wouldn't threaten the union.

What is happening now, with one party increasingly refusing to work with the other side and intentionally breaking the systems that make government work? Yeah - that's a threat to the Union.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago

The majority of the USA is behind Ukraine, it's the magats that are being dumb russian puppets.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

Yes. Every other thing is rage bait to distract you.

I worry that at this point if people haven't figured that out they're never going to

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›